Adjuvant ensartinib delivers ALINA-like DFS in resected ALK+ NSCLC while lung transplant shows striking early survival in refractory lung-limited stage IV NSCLC; TREASURE and ZEAL-1L are negative, and a B7-H3 ADC posts the first phase 3 OS win in relapsed SCLC.
๐ Publications
๐ฆ Twitter / ๐ฆ Bluesky
Full details below โ
Ensartinib in Resected ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. โ Yue Dongsheng et al., N Engl J Med
In the stage IIโIIIB population, 24-month DFS was 86.4% with ensartinib versus 53.5% with placebo (HR 0.20; 95% CI, 0.11โ0.38; P<0.001). Across the overall patient population, 24-month DFS was 87.3% versus 57.2% (HR 0.20; 95% CI, 0.10โ0.37; P<0.001). Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 35.8% of patients receiving ensartinib โ most commonly rash โ compared with 18.2% on placebo.
Clinical bottom line: Adjuvant ensartinib for 24 months after chemotherapy dramatically extends disease-free survival in resected stage IBโIIIB ALK-positive NSCLC, reinforcing molecular testing in early-stage disease.
Phase 3 Study of Niraparib-Plus-Pembrolizumab as Maintenance Therapy for Advanced/Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (ZEAL-1L). โ Ramalingam Suresh S et al., J Thorac Oncol
In the CR/PR population (n=200 receiving niraparib-plus-pembrolizumab; n=201 receiving placebo-plus-pembrolizumab), median PFS was 5.55 months in both arms (HR 1.00; 95% CI, 0.79โ1.27; 1-sided p=0.502). The addition of niraparib to pembrolizumab for maintenance therapy did not result in improved efficacy, and no new safety signals were detected.
Clinical bottom line: Adding niraparib to pembrolizumab maintenance produced no PFS benefit in advanced NSCLC, closing the door on this PARP-plus-checkpoint maintenance strategy.
Differential impact of proton pump inhibitors and antibiotics on immunotherapy efficacy after chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a post-hoc analysis of the PACIFIC trial. โ Brunetti Leonardo et al., Lancet Oncol
In the durvalumab group, baseline PPI use was associated with shorter PFS (9.4 months [95% CI 7.6โ13.7] vs 17.2 months [95% CI 15.4โ23.2]; HR 1.57 [95% CI 1.28โ1.93]; p<0.0001) and shorter OS (33.0 months [95% CI 21.9โ46.7] vs 57.9 months [95% CI 48.7โnot computable]; HR 1.66 [95% CI 1.30โ2.13]; p<0.0001) compared with no PPI exposure. No corresponding difference was observed in the placebo arm.
Clinical bottom line: The published PACIFIC post-hoc draws in additional voices weighing gut-microbiome-modifying drugs, with StephenVLiu and an accompanying Lancet Oncology editorial from ASridharMD and ACortelliniMD calling for prospective, trial-embedded studies of PPI and antibiotic exposure in stage III NSCLC.
Presenting features and outcomes to standard systemic therapies in patients with MTAP-deleted advanced non-small cell lung cancer. โ Huang Julian et al., Clin Cancer Res
MTAP is deleted in 13% of NSCLC, and MTAP two-copy deleted cancer cells are vulnerable to PRMT5 inhibitors under investigation. Patients with MTAPdel versus MTAPwt NSCLC had shorter PFS on anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy (HR 1.70; 95% CI, 1.02โ2.82; p=0.040) and on platinum doublet plus anti-PD-(L)1 therapy (HR 1.89; 95% CI, 1.20โ2.97; p=0.006).
Clinical bottom line: MTAP-deleted NSCLC presents with more aggressive features and PD-L1 TPS <1%, and does worse on anti-PD-(L)1-based therapy, marking a subgroup that needs dedicated targeted approaches.
Impact of Prior Systemic Chemotherapy on Response to ROS1 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in ROS1-Rearranged Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. โ Kashizaki Fumihiro et al., JCO Precis Oncol
Pooled ORR was 79% (95% CI, 72โ84) in TKI-naรฏve cohorts versus 42% (95% CI, 32โ51) in post-crizotinib cohorts. Among 11 TKI-naรฏve cohorts, prior systemic chemotherapy exposure was significantly and inversely associated with ORR (OR 0.33; P=.004).
Clinical bottom line: Prior chemotherapy is associated with lower response to ROS1-TKIs, supporting early use of ROS1-directed therapy when feasible.
Genomic Landscape and Clinical Impact of MTAP Loss in Driver-Positive NSCLC: Insights from a Large-Scale Real-World Chinese Cohort. โ Wei Qianhui et al., J Thorac Oncol
MTAP loss was identified in 10.4% of the overall cohort and was enriched in advanced-stage tumors and those harboring oncogenic drivers, including EGFR mutations, ALK fusions, and MET and ERBB2 amplifications; co-deletion with CDKN2A was highly prevalent at 92.3%. In driver-positive patients, MTAP loss was associated with significantly lower response rate and shorter PFS and OS, especially in EGFR-mutant patients treated with third-generation EGFR-TKIs.
Clinical bottom line: MTAP loss is a robust adverse prognostic biomarker in EGFR-mutant NSCLC on targeted therapy, supporting its integration into risk stratification and combination strategies with PRMT5 or MAT2A inhibition.
Consolidative Thoracic Radiotherapy With Atezolizumab Maintenance in Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Phase 2 TREASURE Randomized Clinical Trial (AIO-TRK-0320). โ Bozorgmehr Farastuk et al., JAMA Oncol
Median OS in the combination arm was numerically shorter than with atezolizumab alone (6.7 months [95% CI, 5.1โ9.0] vs 13.4 months [95% CI, 10.7โ17.5]; HR 1.55 [95% CI, 0.90โ2.69]; P=.34), while median PFS was similar (2.4 months [95% CI, 1.3โ3.9] vs 2.6 months [95% CI, 1.2โ3.9]; HR 0.92 [95% CI, 0.54โ1.55]; P=.85). Adding thoracic radiotherapy was accompanied by higher frequency of severe adverse events (61.3% vs 18.2%; P<.001) and fatal outcomes (19.4% vs 3.0%; P=.04).
Clinical bottom line: Consolidative thoracic radiotherapy added to atezolizumab maintenance in unselected ES-SCLC increased toxicity and deaths without any survival benefit, so it should not be applied broadly.
Lung Transplant for Refractory Lung-Limited Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. โ Bharat Ankit et al., JAMA
The Kaplan-Meier estimated 1-year overall survival was 100.0% (95% CI, 63.1%โ100.0%) among lung transplant recipients with NSCLC versus 40.8% (95% CI, 29.6%โ53.1%) among those who received medical management alone, an absolute difference of 59.2 (95% CI, 46.2โ71.7) percentage points. The 1-year posttransplant survival was 100% (95% CI, 63.1%โ100%) among patients with NSCLC versus 88.1% (95% CI, 83.7%โ91.4%) among patients without cancer, an absolute difference of 11.9 (90% CI, 9.1โ15.5) percentage points.
Clinical bottom line: In a rigorously selected subset of medically refractory, lung-limited stage IV NSCLC with respiratory failure, lung transplant using a dissemination-minimizing technique delivered favorable early survival that challenges the historical exclusion of these patients.
Weight Gain on Lorlatinib is Associated with Accumulation of Visceral Adipose Tissue. โ Mantz Lea et al., J Thorac Oncol
In 67 patients, skeletal muscle index, visceral adipose tissue index, and BMI increased from baseline to 3 months and from 3 months to 6 months; the baseline-to-3-month visceral adipose tissue index rise was 4.23 cmยฒ/mยฒ (95% CI 2.37โ6.19; p<.001) and BMI increased by 0.97 kg/mยฒ (95% CI 0.59โ1.35; p<.001).
Clinical bottom line: Lorlatinib-associated weight gain is preferentially visceral adiposity, so interventions should target visceral fat.
Real-World Implementation of Tarlatamab-Dlle Therapy for Patients With Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer and Other High-Grade Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. โ Carlisle Jennifer W et al., JCO Oncol Pract
Among 49 outpatient SCLC patients with a median follow-up of 6.94 months (95% CI, 5.03โ11.34), the estimated median PFS was 3.7 months (95% CI, 2.7โ5.2) and median OS was 7.1 months (95% CI, 4.9โ9.3). Grade 3 CRS occurred in two patients (4.1%) and grade 3 ICANS in three patients (6.1%).
Clinical bottom line: Outpatient tarlatamab administration for relapsed SCLC is safe and feasible with appropriate monitoring in an on-site immediate care setting.
Germline Mutations as Risk Factors for Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. โ Lee Ji Young et al., J Thorac Oncol
The pooled prevalence of pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants was 7.9% (95% CI, 3.8โ15.9%) with high heterogeneity (Iยฒ=98.8%).
Clinical bottom line: Roughly 8% of lung cancer patients carry pathogenic germline variants, most often in DNA damage repair genes, with higher frequencies in younger patients and non-Asian ancestry.
Brief Report: First-line Chemoimmunotherapy and Chemotherapy Outcomes in Patients with RET Fusion-Positive Lung Cancer in LIBRETTO-431. โ Cui Can et al., J Thorac Oncol
Median PFS by blinded independent central review was 11.2 months (95% CI: 10.9โ16.8) with chemoimmunotherapy versus not reached (95% CI: 4.9โnot reached) with chemotherapy; the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.8). These findings indicate that adding a checkpoint inhibitor to chemotherapy did not improve outcomes over chemotherapy alone in this biomarker-selected population.
Clinical bottom line: Adding a checkpoint inhibitor to chemotherapy did not improve outcomes over chemotherapy alone in RET fusion-positive lung cancer, and selective RET inhibitors remain the preferred first-line therapy.
How these are chosen: filtered for clinical relevance, grouped by the new development discussed, then ordered by engagement (bookmarks and reposts).
GSK announced positive results from the phase III ARTEMIS-008 trial showing that risvutatug rezetecan, a B7-H3 ADC, demonstrated superior overall survival versus topotecan in patients with relapsed SCLC โ marking the first phase 3 OS win for a B7-H3 ADC. Oncologists debating the full dataset noted a continuing preference for tarlatamab in this setting, while the China-only trial population raises the question of how applicable ARTEMIS-008 is to Western standard of care relative to tarlatamab and the global EMBOLD trial.
Discussed by: @StephenVLiu, @DrSanjayPopat, @g_mountzios
The PACIFIC post-hoc analysis showed that, in the durvalumab group, baseline PPI use was associated with shorter PFS (9.4 months vs 17.2 months with no PPI; HR 1.57) and shorter OS (33 months vs 57.9 months; HR 1.66), with no corresponding difference in the placebo arm and similar PFS findings observed with antibiotics. An accompanying editorial argues that prospective studies with standardised exposure definitions and trial-embedded interventions are required to translate findings on microbiota-modifying medications in locally advanced NSCLC into actionable practice, leaving unresolved whether baseline PPI and antibiotic use should be actively minimized in patients starting durvalumab after concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
Discussed by: @StephenVLiu, @Dr_ElvinaA, @Latinamd
In the stage IIโIIIB population, 24-month DFS was 86.4% with ensartinib versus 53.5% with placebo (HR 0.20; 95% CI, 0.11โ0.38; P<0.001), with the overall population showing 87.3% versus 57.2% at the same HR of 0.20 โ described by clinicians as the same striking HR as ALINA. Grade โฅ3 adverse events were 35.8% versus 18.2%, predominantly rash, while OS remains immature; debate centers on whether this ALINA-like DFS benefit justifies routine two-year adjuvant ALK inhibition after chemotherapy and how molecular testing should be integrated into early-stage NSCLC workup.
Discussed by: @StephenVLiu, @YGaritaonaindia, @HHorinouchi
The Kaplan-Meier estimated 1-year overall survival was 100% in the lung transplant group versus 40.8% for those who received medical management alone โ a striking absolute difference of 59.2 percentage points โ in a rigorously selected population with refractory lung-limited stage IV NSCLC. Lung transplant following contemporary staging and a dissemination-minimizing surgical technique was associated with higher early overall survival compared with medical management alone, though the question remains how this single-center DREAM registry experience can be scaled and confirmed given that nonbiologic barriers limited transplant access in most eligible patients.
Discussed by: @christinemphmd, @JAMA_current
A study of first-line ifebemtinib (a FAK inhibitor) plus garsorasib (a KRAS G12C inhibitor) in KRAS G12C NSCLC, published in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, reported a response rate of 82%, median PFS of 22.3 months, and median OS of 27.8 months, with 24% of patients experiencing grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events including proteinuria, diarrhea, anemia, hypertension, and pneumonia. Clinicians noted encouraging signals despite small numbers, with the central debate being whether a FAK inhibitor plus KRAS G12C inhibitor combination can move first-line KRAS G12C NSCLC beyond single-agent inhibition.
Discussed by: @StephenVLiu, @newsen.bsky.social
In the TREASURE trial, median OS was numerically shorter with the combination of thoracic radiotherapy plus atezolizumab versus atezolizumab alone (6.7 months vs 13.4 months; HR 1.55; 95% CI, 0.90โ2.69), median PFS showed no difference (2.4 months vs 2.6 months; HR 0.92), and severe adverse events were markedly more frequent (61.3% vs 18.2%) with fatal events in 19.4% versus 3.0%. With both TREASURE and TRIPLEX demonstrating added toxicity from thoracic radiotherapy in ES-SCLC, clinicians are debating whether any role remains for consolidative radiotherapy outside carefully selected patients.
Discussed by: @YGaritaonaindia, @OncoAlert
Vivek Subbiah, MD @VivekSubbiah
โญ๏ธEnsartinib in Resected ALK-Positive NonโSmall-Cell Lung Cancer | New England Journal of Medicine https://t.co/lJc0Kne6Yr
๐ 3 โค๏ธ 11 ๐ 3 ๐ 1,777
OncoAlert @OncoAlert
RT @UOzkerim: Adjuvant ALK inhibition continues to reshape early-stage NSCLC.
In this phase III trial, ensartinib significantly improved disease-free survival after complete resection of stage IBโIIIB ALK-positive NSCLC:
โ 24-month DFS: 86.4% vs 53.5%
โ HR 0.20 (95% CI, 0.11โ0.38; P<0.001)
Overall survival data remain immature, but these results further strengthen the role of targeted therapy in resected ALK-positive disease.
@OncoAlert @GlopesMd @StephenVLiu @weoncologists @OncoReporte @MedwatchKate @ManuelDomine @_SEOM
๐ 0 โค๏ธ 15 ๐ 7 ๐ 1,034
OncLive.com @OncLive
Phase 3 HARMONi-6 OS data are in: ivonescimab + chemo delivered a meaningful survival advantage over tislelizumab + chemo in previously untreated advanced squamous NSCLC, with a manageable safety profile. Shun Lu, MD, PhD reports the findings.
Watch the full OncLiveยฎ Rapid Readout: https://t.co/imSJM0SWDo
#NSCLC #LungCancer #Ivonescimab
๐ 0 โค๏ธ 3 ๐ 5 ๐ 485
OncLive.com @OncLive
Phase 3 ELEVATE data show that adjuvant ensartinib significantly improved disease-free survival vs placebo in resected ALK-positive NSCLC. @NEJM #lcsm #oncology
https://t.co/j3gvSpHUj3
๐ 0 โค๏ธ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ 306
Yago Garitaonaindรญa @YGaritaonaindia
๐ฃJust published in @NEJM: adjuvant ensartinib in completely resected ALK+ #NSCLC (ELEVATE, phase 3)
โข 24-mo DFS, stage IIโIIIB: 86.4% vs 53.5% | HR 0.20
โข Overall population: 87.3% vs 57.2% | HR 0.20
โข Grade โฅ3 AEs: 35.8% vs 18.2% (mostly rash)
โข OS still immature
โ Same striking HR as ALINA.
โ ๏ธ ensartinib came AFTER adjuvant chemo vs placebo
Link ๐๐๐
#LCSM #ALK
๐ 4 โค๏ธ 14 ๐ 10 ๐ 1,198
OncLive @onclive.bsky.social
Phase 3 ELEVATE data show that adjuvant ensartinib significantly improved disease-free survival vs placebo in resected ALK-positive NSCLC. @nejm.org #lcsm #oncology
www.onclive.com/view/ensarti...
๐ 0 โค๏ธ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ 0
ALK Positive Lung Cancer UK @alkpositiveuk.bsky.social
New in NEJM: The Phase III ELEVATE trial found that adjuvant ensartinib significantly improved disease-free survival after surgery for ALK-positive #lungcancer. Another reminder that biomarker testing is increasingly important in early-stage lung cancer too.
www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.... #LCSM
๐ 0 โค๏ธ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ 0
OncoAlert @OncoAlert
RT @StephenVLiu: Phase III ELEVATE trial @NEJM for pts with resected stage IB to IIIB ALK+ NSCLC after adjuvant chemo randomized to ensartinib vs placebo x 2y (n=274). In stage II-III, 2y DFS 86.4% vs 53.5% (HR 0.20). Molecular testing for early stage NSCLC is critical!
https://t.co/6wQSu17deh
๐ 16 โค๏ธ 58 ๐ 20 ๐ 3,721
OncoAlert @OncoAlert
Ensartinib in Resected ALK-Positive NonโSmall-Cell Lung Cancer
https://t.co/cZl3L8PjWM
In this phase 3 trial, 274 patients with completely resected ALK-positive stage IBโIIIB #NSCLC #LungCancer received ensartinib or placebo after adjuvant chemotherapy. Ensartinib ๐งช significantly improved disease-free survival, reducing recurrence or death risk by 80%.
At 24 months, disease-free survival was 86โ87% with ensartinib versus 53โ57% with placebo. Grade โฅ3 adverse events were more frequent with ensartinib, mainly rash. Overall survival data remain immature.
๐จ Pinging our incredible Lung Cancer Faculty!
@peters_solange
@christine_lovly
@GlopesMd
@DrSanjayPopat
@StephenVLiu
@HenningWillers
@HHorinouchi
@BRicciutiMD
@PercyLeeMD
@jillfeldman4
@bensolomon1
@Latinamd
@DrJNaidoo
@barlesi
@UOzkerim
@FernandoOnco
@DrMirallas
@VanitaNoronha
@NarjustFlorezMD
@MartinReck2
๐ 3 โค๏ธ 18 ๐ 8 ๐ 1,349
Hidehito HORINOUCHI @HHorinouchi
๐ฅELEVATE: Adjuvant ensartinib in resected ALK+ NSCLC
๐ @NEJM
โStage IB-IIIB ALK+ NSCLC post-resection & adjuvant chemo
๐ฏ24-mo DFS rate 86.4 vs 53.5% (HR 0.20, 95%CI
0.11 to 0.38) in stage II-IIIB; OS immature
๐ขNCT05341583
๐Dr. Dongsheng Yue
#LCSM @OncoAlert @Larvol @ALKPositiveinc
https://t.co/a8A6Nr3Cj2
๐ 3 โค๏ธ 8 ๐ 2 ๐ 1,068
OncLive.com @OncLive
7-year CROWN data: lorlatinib's median PFS still not reached vs 9.1 months with crizotinib in first-line ALK+ NSCLC (HR, 0.19). Alice Shaw, MD, PhD, reports 55% of lorlatinib patients remain progression-free at year 7, with sustained CNS control.
Read the full analysis: https://t.co/qpZBwJUtSc
#ALKPositiveNSCLC #Lorlatinib #LungCancer
๐ 0 โค๏ธ 5 ๐ 6 ๐ 726
Lung Cancers Today @Lung_Cancers
๐ซ ICYMI: Divarasib showed โclinically meaningful and statistically significant improvementsโ in both PFS and OS in the Krascendo 1 trial, meeting its primary and key secondary end points.
โก๏ธ Learn more: https://t.co/aoMHqsC97q
#lcsm #KRAS #NSCLC #LungCancer https://t.co/2OYwOcP3xc
๐ 0 โค๏ธ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ 84
Chris @Chris_Onc
#Perioperative NSCLC | Review | Nat Rev Clin Oncol
Neoadjuvant/perioperative chemo-IO is now standard for resectable non-oncogene-driven #NSCLC - but its success came from applying one uniform regimen across biologically heterogeneous tumors. This review reframes the question: not whether chemo-IO works, but how to decide who needs escalation, de-escalation, or could safely avoid unnecessary therapy.
Key messages:
๐น pCR as the anchor. #pCR (0% residual viable tumor) is a robust, pan-trial surrogate for durable benefit โ CheckMate 816 showed 5-yr OS >95% in pCR patients. It's the key anchor for adjuvant-phase escalation/de-escalation decisions. But ~30% pCR rates mean most patients don't achieve it.
๐น Baseline biomarkers aren't enough alone. PD-L1 TPS โฅ50% raises pCR likelihood (~40%), but no single baseline marker - PD-L1, TMB, TIL, clinical features - reliably guides escalation in isolation. The field needs dynamic, on-treatment readouts.
๐น Dynamic biomarkers are the frontier. #ctDNA clearance, radiomics (AEGEAN-derived signatures predicted pCR at AUC 0.78), and metabolic imaging capture early response and complement pะกR - but none is yet robust enough to replace pathology or guide de-escalation alone.
๐น Intensifying for high-risk biology. For PD-L1-negative/immune-desert tumors where chemo-IO adds limited OS benefit, emerging strategies - TROP2 ADCs (Dato-DXd: pCR 35.2%, independent of PD-L1), PD-1รVEGF bispecifics (~30โ44% pCR), novel ICI combos (LAG3, anti-CTLA4), mRNA vaccines, immune-sensitizing radiotherapy - aim to lift pCR and rescue insufficient responders.
The core tension is escalation vs. de-escalation timing - and whether surgery itself provides incremental benefit in every pCR patient, or mainly adds morbidity in some. The review's answer is a response-adaptive perioperative framework: baseline stratification โ early on-treatment ctDNA/immune/radiomic dynamics โ tailored local therapy (limited resection, consolidation radiotherapy, or switching systemic treatment) โ pCR-guided adjuvant decisions (de-escalate if pCR; escalate/trial if residual disease).
Future direction: The recurring structural flaw is biomarker-agnostic trial design in unselected populations - effective agents keep failing to reach their optimal niche not from lack of efficacy, but from being tested in the wrong patients. The call to action: integrate dynamic imaging, ctDNA kinetics, and immune profiling into biomarker-enriched, adaptive trial designs - maximizing pCR in high-risk patients while sparing favorable-biology patients from overtreatment.
๐ 0 โค๏ธ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ 6
The OncoAlert Network ๐จ @oncoalert.bsky.social
Ensartinib in Resected ALK-Positive NonโSmall-Cell Lung Cancer
www.nejm.org/doi/full/10....
In this phase 3 trial, 274 patients with completely resected ALK-positive stage IBโIIIB #NSCLC #LungCancer received ensartinib or placebo after adjuvant chemotherapy. Ensartinib ๐งช improved DFS
๐ 0 โค๏ธ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ 0
Elad Sharon @EladSharonMD
RT @StephenVLiu: Post hoc analysis of PACIFIC (durvalumab after CRT for stage III NSCLC) @TheLancetOncol shows 40% used PPIs at baseline; with durvalumab, PFS 9.4m vs 17.2m with no PPI (HR 1.57) and OS 33m vs 57.9m (HR 1.66). No difference with placebo. Similar PFS findings with antibiotics. https://t.co/HUe303l1dR
๐ 24 โค๏ธ 63 ๐ 25 ๐ 5,484
Prepared by Rafael Santana-Davila, M.D. Questions or feedback? Just reply to this email.
Disclaimer: This digest is AI-generated. Content may contain errors -- always verify with original sources.
Know a colleague who would find this useful? Just forward them this email.