๐Ÿ“ฌ Lung/Head and Neck/Thymoma Intelligence Digest โ€” Week 2026-W29

Adjuvant ensartinib delivers ALINA-like DFS in resected ALK+ NSCLC while lung transplant shows striking early survival in refractory lung-limited stage IV NSCLC; TREASURE and ZEAL-1L are negative, and a B7-H3 ADC posts the first phase 3 OS win in relapsed SCLC.

โšก TL;DR

๐Ÿ“„ Publications

๐Ÿฆ Twitter / ๐Ÿฆ‹ Bluesky

Full details below โ†“

๐Ÿ“„ What's Being Published

Manuscripts:

Ensartinib in Resected ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. โ€” Yue Dongsheng et al., N Engl J Med

In the stage IIโ€“IIIB population, 24-month DFS was 86.4% with ensartinib versus 53.5% with placebo (HR 0.20; 95% CI, 0.11โ€“0.38; P<0.001). Across the overall patient population, 24-month DFS was 87.3% versus 57.2% (HR 0.20; 95% CI, 0.10โ€“0.37; P<0.001). Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 35.8% of patients receiving ensartinib โ€” most commonly rash โ€” compared with 18.2% on placebo.

Clinical bottom line: Adjuvant ensartinib for 24 months after chemotherapy dramatically extends disease-free survival in resected stage IBโ€“IIIB ALK-positive NSCLC, reinforcing molecular testing in early-stage disease.

Read full article โ†’

๐Ÿ”— Also discussed on social media โ†’

Phase 3 Study of Niraparib-Plus-Pembrolizumab as Maintenance Therapy for Advanced/Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (ZEAL-1L). โ€” Ramalingam Suresh S et al., J Thorac Oncol

In the CR/PR population (n=200 receiving niraparib-plus-pembrolizumab; n=201 receiving placebo-plus-pembrolizumab), median PFS was 5.55 months in both arms (HR 1.00; 95% CI, 0.79โ€“1.27; 1-sided p=0.502). The addition of niraparib to pembrolizumab for maintenance therapy did not result in improved efficacy, and no new safety signals were detected.

Clinical bottom line: Adding niraparib to pembrolizumab maintenance produced no PFS benefit in advanced NSCLC, closing the door on this PARP-plus-checkpoint maintenance strategy.

Read full article โ†’

Differential impact of proton pump inhibitors and antibiotics on immunotherapy efficacy after chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a post-hoc analysis of the PACIFIC trial. โ€” Brunetti Leonardo et al., Lancet Oncol

In the durvalumab group, baseline PPI use was associated with shorter PFS (9.4 months [95% CI 7.6โ€“13.7] vs 17.2 months [95% CI 15.4โ€“23.2]; HR 1.57 [95% CI 1.28โ€“1.93]; p<0.0001) and shorter OS (33.0 months [95% CI 21.9โ€“46.7] vs 57.9 months [95% CI 48.7โ€“not computable]; HR 1.66 [95% CI 1.30โ€“2.13]; p<0.0001) compared with no PPI exposure. No corresponding difference was observed in the placebo arm.

Clinical bottom line: The published PACIFIC post-hoc draws in additional voices weighing gut-microbiome-modifying drugs, with StephenVLiu and an accompanying Lancet Oncology editorial from ASridharMD and ACortelliniMD calling for prospective, trial-embedded studies of PPI and antibiotic exposure in stage III NSCLC.

Read full article โ†’

๐Ÿ”— Also discussed on social media โ†’

Presenting features and outcomes to standard systemic therapies in patients with MTAP-deleted advanced non-small cell lung cancer. โ€” Huang Julian et al., Clin Cancer Res

MTAP is deleted in 13% of NSCLC, and MTAP two-copy deleted cancer cells are vulnerable to PRMT5 inhibitors under investigation. Patients with MTAPdel versus MTAPwt NSCLC had shorter PFS on anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy (HR 1.70; 95% CI, 1.02โ€“2.82; p=0.040) and on platinum doublet plus anti-PD-(L)1 therapy (HR 1.89; 95% CI, 1.20โ€“2.97; p=0.006).

Clinical bottom line: MTAP-deleted NSCLC presents with more aggressive features and PD-L1 TPS <1%, and does worse on anti-PD-(L)1-based therapy, marking a subgroup that needs dedicated targeted approaches.

Read full article โ†’

Impact of Prior Systemic Chemotherapy on Response to ROS1 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in ROS1-Rearranged Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. โ€” Kashizaki Fumihiro et al., JCO Precis Oncol

Pooled ORR was 79% (95% CI, 72โ€“84) in TKI-naรฏve cohorts versus 42% (95% CI, 32โ€“51) in post-crizotinib cohorts. Among 11 TKI-naรฏve cohorts, prior systemic chemotherapy exposure was significantly and inversely associated with ORR (OR 0.33; P=.004).

Clinical bottom line: Prior chemotherapy is associated with lower response to ROS1-TKIs, supporting early use of ROS1-directed therapy when feasible.

Read full article โ†’

Genomic Landscape and Clinical Impact of MTAP Loss in Driver-Positive NSCLC: Insights from a Large-Scale Real-World Chinese Cohort. โ€” Wei Qianhui et al., J Thorac Oncol

MTAP loss was identified in 10.4% of the overall cohort and was enriched in advanced-stage tumors and those harboring oncogenic drivers, including EGFR mutations, ALK fusions, and MET and ERBB2 amplifications; co-deletion with CDKN2A was highly prevalent at 92.3%. In driver-positive patients, MTAP loss was associated with significantly lower response rate and shorter PFS and OS, especially in EGFR-mutant patients treated with third-generation EGFR-TKIs.

Clinical bottom line: MTAP loss is a robust adverse prognostic biomarker in EGFR-mutant NSCLC on targeted therapy, supporting its integration into risk stratification and combination strategies with PRMT5 or MAT2A inhibition.

Read full article โ†’

Consolidative Thoracic Radiotherapy With Atezolizumab Maintenance in Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Phase 2 TREASURE Randomized Clinical Trial (AIO-TRK-0320). โ€” Bozorgmehr Farastuk et al., JAMA Oncol

Median OS in the combination arm was numerically shorter than with atezolizumab alone (6.7 months [95% CI, 5.1โ€“9.0] vs 13.4 months [95% CI, 10.7โ€“17.5]; HR 1.55 [95% CI, 0.90โ€“2.69]; P=.34), while median PFS was similar (2.4 months [95% CI, 1.3โ€“3.9] vs 2.6 months [95% CI, 1.2โ€“3.9]; HR 0.92 [95% CI, 0.54โ€“1.55]; P=.85). Adding thoracic radiotherapy was accompanied by higher frequency of severe adverse events (61.3% vs 18.2%; P<.001) and fatal outcomes (19.4% vs 3.0%; P=.04).

Clinical bottom line: Consolidative thoracic radiotherapy added to atezolizumab maintenance in unselected ES-SCLC increased toxicity and deaths without any survival benefit, so it should not be applied broadly.

Read full article โ†’

Lung Transplant for Refractory Lung-Limited Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. โ€” Bharat Ankit et al., JAMA

The Kaplan-Meier estimated 1-year overall survival was 100.0% (95% CI, 63.1%โ€“100.0%) among lung transplant recipients with NSCLC versus 40.8% (95% CI, 29.6%โ€“53.1%) among those who received medical management alone, an absolute difference of 59.2 (95% CI, 46.2โ€“71.7) percentage points. The 1-year posttransplant survival was 100% (95% CI, 63.1%โ€“100%) among patients with NSCLC versus 88.1% (95% CI, 83.7%โ€“91.4%) among patients without cancer, an absolute difference of 11.9 (90% CI, 9.1โ€“15.5) percentage points.

Clinical bottom line: In a rigorously selected subset of medically refractory, lung-limited stage IV NSCLC with respiratory failure, lung transplant using a dissemination-minimizing technique delivered favorable early survival that challenges the historical exclusion of these patients.

Read full article โ†’

Weight Gain on Lorlatinib is Associated with Accumulation of Visceral Adipose Tissue. โ€” Mantz Lea et al., J Thorac Oncol

In 67 patients, skeletal muscle index, visceral adipose tissue index, and BMI increased from baseline to 3 months and from 3 months to 6 months; the baseline-to-3-month visceral adipose tissue index rise was 4.23 cmยฒ/mยฒ (95% CI 2.37โ€“6.19; p<.001) and BMI increased by 0.97 kg/mยฒ (95% CI 0.59โ€“1.35; p<.001).

Clinical bottom line: Lorlatinib-associated weight gain is preferentially visceral adiposity, so interventions should target visceral fat.

Read full article โ†’

Real-World Implementation of Tarlatamab-Dlle Therapy for Patients With Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer and Other High-Grade Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. โ€” Carlisle Jennifer W et al., JCO Oncol Pract

Among 49 outpatient SCLC patients with a median follow-up of 6.94 months (95% CI, 5.03โ€“11.34), the estimated median PFS was 3.7 months (95% CI, 2.7โ€“5.2) and median OS was 7.1 months (95% CI, 4.9โ€“9.3). Grade 3 CRS occurred in two patients (4.1%) and grade 3 ICANS in three patients (6.1%).

Clinical bottom line: Outpatient tarlatamab administration for relapsed SCLC is safe and feasible with appropriate monitoring in an on-site immediate care setting.

Read full article โ†’

Germline Mutations as Risk Factors for Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. โ€” Lee Ji Young et al., J Thorac Oncol

The pooled prevalence of pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants was 7.9% (95% CI, 3.8โ€“15.9%) with high heterogeneity (Iยฒ=98.8%).

Clinical bottom line: Roughly 8% of lung cancer patients carry pathogenic germline variants, most often in DNA damage repair genes, with higher frequencies in younger patients and non-Asian ancestry.

Read full article โ†’

Brief Report: First-line Chemoimmunotherapy and Chemotherapy Outcomes in Patients with RET Fusion-Positive Lung Cancer in LIBRETTO-431. โ€” Cui Can et al., J Thorac Oncol

Median PFS by blinded independent central review was 11.2 months (95% CI: 10.9โ€“16.8) with chemoimmunotherapy versus not reached (95% CI: 4.9โ€“not reached) with chemotherapy; the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.8). These findings indicate that adding a checkpoint inhibitor to chemotherapy did not improve outcomes over chemotherapy alone in this biomarker-selected population.

Clinical bottom line: Adding a checkpoint inhibitor to chemotherapy did not improve outcomes over chemotherapy alone in RET fusion-positive lung cancer, and selective RET inhibitors remain the preferred first-line therapy.

Read full article โ†’

๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ What People Were Discussing This Week

How these are chosen: filtered for clinical relevance, grouped by the new development discussed, then ordered by engagement (bookmarks and reposts).

ARTEMIS-008: first phase 3 OS win for a B7-H3 ADC in relapsed SCLC

GSK announced positive results from the phase III ARTEMIS-008 trial showing that risvutatug rezetecan, a B7-H3 ADC, demonstrated superior overall survival versus topotecan in patients with relapsed SCLC โ€” marking the first phase 3 OS win for a B7-H3 ADC. Oncologists debating the full dataset noted a continuing preference for tarlatamab in this setting, while the China-only trial population raises the question of how applicable ARTEMIS-008 is to Western standard of care relative to tarlatamab and the global EMBOLD trial.

Discussed by: @StephenVLiu, @DrSanjayPopat, @g_mountzios

โ†’ View representative tweet

Update: PACIFIC post-hoc pulls in editorial voices on PPIs, antibiotics and the gut microbiome

The PACIFIC post-hoc analysis showed that, in the durvalumab group, baseline PPI use was associated with shorter PFS (9.4 months vs 17.2 months with no PPI; HR 1.57) and shorter OS (33 months vs 57.9 months; HR 1.66), with no corresponding difference in the placebo arm and similar PFS findings observed with antibiotics. An accompanying editorial argues that prospective studies with standardised exposure definitions and trial-embedded interventions are required to translate findings on microbiota-modifying medications in locally advanced NSCLC into actionable practice, leaving unresolved whether baseline PPI and antibiotic use should be actively minimized in patients starting durvalumab after concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Discussed by: @StephenVLiu, @Dr_ElvinaA, @Latinamd

โ†’ View representative tweet

ELEVATE: adjuvant ensartinib matches ALINA-level DFS in resected ALK+ NSCLC

In the stage IIโ€“IIIB population, 24-month DFS was 86.4% with ensartinib versus 53.5% with placebo (HR 0.20; 95% CI, 0.11โ€“0.38; P<0.001), with the overall population showing 87.3% versus 57.2% at the same HR of 0.20 โ€” described by clinicians as the same striking HR as ALINA. Grade โ‰ฅ3 adverse events were 35.8% versus 18.2%, predominantly rash, while OS remains immature; debate centers on whether this ALINA-like DFS benefit justifies routine two-year adjuvant ALK inhibition after chemotherapy and how molecular testing should be integrated into early-stage NSCLC workup.

Discussed by: @StephenVLiu, @YGaritaonaindia, @HHorinouchi

โ†’ View representative tweet

DREAM: lung transplant offers striking early survival in refractory lung-limited stage IV NSCLC

The Kaplan-Meier estimated 1-year overall survival was 100% in the lung transplant group versus 40.8% for those who received medical management alone โ€” a striking absolute difference of 59.2 percentage points โ€” in a rigorously selected population with refractory lung-limited stage IV NSCLC. Lung transplant following contemporary staging and a dissemination-minimizing surgical technique was associated with higher early overall survival compared with medical management alone, though the question remains how this single-center DREAM registry experience can be scaled and confirmed given that nonbiologic barriers limited transplant access in most eligible patients.

Discussed by: @christinemphmd, @JAMA_current

โ†’ View representative tweet

Ifebemtinib plus garsorasib delivers high response in first-line KRAS G12C NSCLC

A study of first-line ifebemtinib (a FAK inhibitor) plus garsorasib (a KRAS G12C inhibitor) in KRAS G12C NSCLC, published in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, reported a response rate of 82%, median PFS of 22.3 months, and median OS of 27.8 months, with 24% of patients experiencing grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events including proteinuria, diarrhea, anemia, hypertension, and pneumonia. Clinicians noted encouraging signals despite small numbers, with the central debate being whether a FAK inhibitor plus KRAS G12C inhibitor combination can move first-line KRAS G12C NSCLC beyond single-agent inhibition.

Discussed by: @StephenVLiu, @newsen.bsky.social

โ†’ View representative tweet

TREASURE: consolidative thoracic radiotherapy adds toxicity without survival in ES-SCLC

In the TREASURE trial, median OS was numerically shorter with the combination of thoracic radiotherapy plus atezolizumab versus atezolizumab alone (6.7 months vs 13.4 months; HR 1.55; 95% CI, 0.90โ€“2.69), median PFS showed no difference (2.4 months vs 2.6 months; HR 0.92), and severe adverse events were markedly more frequent (61.3% vs 18.2%) with fatal events in 19.4% versus 3.0%. With both TREASURE and TRIPLEX demonstrating added toxicity from thoracic radiotherapy in ES-SCLC, clinicians are debating whether any role remains for consolidative radiotherapy outside carefully selected patients.

Discussed by: @YGaritaonaindia, @OncoAlert

โ†’ View representative tweet

๐Ÿ”ฅ Top Ranked Tweets

Vivek Subbiah, MD @VivekSubbiah

โญ๏ธEnsartinib in Resected ALK-Positive Nonโ€“Small-Cell Lung Cancer | New England Journal of Medicine https://t.co/lJc0Kne6Yr

๐Ÿ”– 3   โค๏ธ 11   ๐Ÿ” 3   ๐Ÿ‘ 1,777

View on X โ†’

OncoAlert @OncoAlert

RT @UOzkerim: Adjuvant ALK inhibition continues to reshape early-stage NSCLC.

In this phase III trial, ensartinib significantly improved disease-free survival after complete resection of stage IBโ€“IIIB ALK-positive NSCLC:

โœ… 24-month DFS: 86.4% vs 53.5%
โœ… HR 0.20 (95% CI, 0.11โ€“0.38; P<0.001)

Overall survival data remain immature, but these results further strengthen the role of targeted therapy in resected ALK-positive disease.

@OncoAlert @GlopesMd @StephenVLiu @weoncologists @OncoReporte @MedwatchKate @ManuelDomine @_SEOM

๐Ÿ”– 0   โค๏ธ 15   ๐Ÿ” 7   ๐Ÿ‘ 1,034

View on X โ†’

OncLive.com @OncLive

Phase 3 HARMONi-6 OS data are in: ivonescimab + chemo delivered a meaningful survival advantage over tislelizumab + chemo in previously untreated advanced squamous NSCLC, with a manageable safety profile. Shun Lu, MD, PhD reports the findings.

Watch the full OncLiveยฎ Rapid Readout: https://t.co/imSJM0SWDo

#NSCLC #LungCancer #Ivonescimab

๐Ÿ”– 0   โค๏ธ 3   ๐Ÿ” 5   ๐Ÿ‘ 485

View on X โ†’

OncLive.com @OncLive

Phase 3 ELEVATE data show that adjuvant ensartinib significantly improved disease-free survival vs placebo in resected ALK-positive NSCLC. @NEJM #lcsm #oncology

https://t.co/j3gvSpHUj3

๐Ÿ”– 0   โค๏ธ 1   ๐Ÿ” 0   ๐Ÿ‘ 306

View on X โ†’

Yago Garitaonaindรญa @YGaritaonaindia

๐Ÿ“ฃJust published in @NEJM: adjuvant ensartinib in completely resected ALK+ #NSCLC (ELEVATE, phase 3)

โ€ข 24-mo DFS, stage IIโ€“IIIB: 86.4% vs 53.5% | HR 0.20
โ€ข Overall population: 87.3% vs 57.2% | HR 0.20
โ€ข Grade โ‰ฅ3 AEs: 35.8% vs 18.2% (mostly rash)
โ€ข OS still immature

โœ… Same striking HR as ALINA.

โš ๏ธ ensartinib came AFTER adjuvant chemo vs placebo

Link ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡

#LCSM #ALK

๐Ÿ”– 4   โค๏ธ 14   ๐Ÿ” 10   ๐Ÿ‘ 1,198

View on X โ†’

OncLive @onclive.bsky.social

Phase 3 ELEVATE data show that adjuvant ensartinib significantly improved disease-free survival vs placebo in resected ALK-positive NSCLC. @nejm.org #lcsm #oncology

www.onclive.com/view/ensarti...

๐Ÿ”– 0   โค๏ธ 0   ๐Ÿ” 0   ๐Ÿ‘ 0

View on X โ†’

ALK Positive Lung Cancer UK @alkpositiveuk.bsky.social

New in NEJM: The Phase III ELEVATE trial found that adjuvant ensartinib significantly improved disease-free survival after surgery for ALK-positive #lungcancer. Another reminder that biomarker testing is increasingly important in early-stage lung cancer too.

www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.... #LCSM

๐Ÿ”– 0   โค๏ธ 0   ๐Ÿ” 0   ๐Ÿ‘ 0

View on X โ†’

OncoAlert @OncoAlert

RT @StephenVLiu: Phase III ELEVATE trial @NEJM for pts with resected stage IB to IIIB ALK+ NSCLC after adjuvant chemo randomized to ensartinib vs placebo x 2y (n=274). In stage II-III, 2y DFS 86.4% vs 53.5% (HR 0.20). Molecular testing for early stage NSCLC is critical!

https://t.co/6wQSu17deh

๐Ÿ”– 16   โค๏ธ 58   ๐Ÿ” 20   ๐Ÿ‘ 3,721

View on X โ†’

OncoAlert @OncoAlert

Ensartinib in Resected ALK-Positive Nonโ€“Small-Cell Lung Cancer

https://t.co/cZl3L8PjWM

In this phase 3 trial, 274 patients with completely resected ALK-positive stage IBโ€“IIIB #NSCLC #LungCancer received ensartinib or placebo after adjuvant chemotherapy. Ensartinib ๐Ÿงช significantly improved disease-free survival, reducing recurrence or death risk by 80%.

At 24 months, disease-free survival was 86โ€“87% with ensartinib versus 53โ€“57% with placebo. Grade โ‰ฅ3 adverse events were more frequent with ensartinib, mainly rash. Overall survival data remain immature.

๐Ÿšจ Pinging our incredible Lung Cancer Faculty!

@peters_solange
@christine_lovly
@GlopesMd
@DrSanjayPopat
@StephenVLiu
@HenningWillers
@HHorinouchi
@BRicciutiMD
@PercyLeeMD
@jillfeldman4
@bensolomon1
@Latinamd
@DrJNaidoo
@barlesi
@UOzkerim
@FernandoOnco
@DrMirallas
@VanitaNoronha
@NarjustFlorezMD
@MartinReck2

๐Ÿ”– 3   โค๏ธ 18   ๐Ÿ” 8   ๐Ÿ‘ 1,349

View on X โ†’

Hidehito HORINOUCHI @HHorinouchi

๐Ÿ”ฅELEVATE: Adjuvant ensartinib in resected ALK+ NSCLC
๐Ÿ†™ @NEJM
โ˜‘Stage IB-IIIB ALK+ NSCLC post-resection & adjuvant chemo
๐ŸŽฏ24-mo DFS rate 86.4 vs 53.5% (HR 0.20, 95%CI
0.11 to 0.38) in stage II-IIIB; OS immature
๐Ÿ”ขNCT05341583
๐ŸŽ™Dr. Dongsheng Yue
#LCSM @OncoAlert @Larvol @ALKPositiveinc
https://t.co/a8A6Nr3Cj2

๐Ÿ”– 3   โค๏ธ 8   ๐Ÿ” 2   ๐Ÿ‘ 1,068

View on X โ†’

OncLive.com @OncLive

7-year CROWN data: lorlatinib's median PFS still not reached vs 9.1 months with crizotinib in first-line ALK+ NSCLC (HR, 0.19). Alice Shaw, MD, PhD, reports 55% of lorlatinib patients remain progression-free at year 7, with sustained CNS control.

Read the full analysis: https://t.co/qpZBwJUtSc

#ALKPositiveNSCLC #Lorlatinib #LungCancer

๐Ÿ”– 0   โค๏ธ 5   ๐Ÿ” 6   ๐Ÿ‘ 726

View on X โ†’

Lung Cancers Today @Lung_Cancers

๐Ÿซ ICYMI: Divarasib showed โ€œclinically meaningful and statistically significant improvementsโ€ in both PFS and OS in the Krascendo 1 trial, meeting its primary and key secondary end points.

โžก๏ธ Learn more: https://t.co/aoMHqsC97q

#lcsm #KRAS #NSCLC #LungCancer https://t.co/2OYwOcP3xc

๐Ÿ”– 0   โค๏ธ 0   ๐Ÿ” 0   ๐Ÿ‘ 84

View on X โ†’

Chris @Chris_Onc

#Perioperative NSCLC | Review | Nat Rev Clin Oncol

Neoadjuvant/perioperative chemo-IO is now standard for resectable non-oncogene-driven #NSCLC - but its success came from applying one uniform regimen across biologically heterogeneous tumors. This review reframes the question: not whether chemo-IO works, but how to decide who needs escalation, de-escalation, or could safely avoid unnecessary therapy.

Key messages:
๐Ÿ”น pCR as the anchor. #pCR (0% residual viable tumor) is a robust, pan-trial surrogate for durable benefit โ€” CheckMate 816 showed 5-yr OS >95% in pCR patients. It's the key anchor for adjuvant-phase escalation/de-escalation decisions. But ~30% pCR rates mean most patients don't achieve it.
๐Ÿ”น Baseline biomarkers aren't enough alone. PD-L1 TPS โ‰ฅ50% raises pCR likelihood (~40%), but no single baseline marker - PD-L1, TMB, TIL, clinical features - reliably guides escalation in isolation. The field needs dynamic, on-treatment readouts.
๐Ÿ”น Dynamic biomarkers are the frontier. #ctDNA clearance, radiomics (AEGEAN-derived signatures predicted pCR at AUC 0.78), and metabolic imaging capture early response and complement pะกR - but none is yet robust enough to replace pathology or guide de-escalation alone.
๐Ÿ”น Intensifying for high-risk biology. For PD-L1-negative/immune-desert tumors where chemo-IO adds limited OS benefit, emerging strategies - TROP2 ADCs (Dato-DXd: pCR 35.2%, independent of PD-L1), PD-1ร—VEGF bispecifics (~30โ€“44% pCR), novel ICI combos (LAG3, anti-CTLA4), mRNA vaccines, immune-sensitizing radiotherapy - aim to lift pCR and rescue insufficient responders.

The core tension is escalation vs. de-escalation timing - and whether surgery itself provides incremental benefit in every pCR patient, or mainly adds morbidity in some. The review's answer is a response-adaptive perioperative framework: baseline stratification โ†’ early on-treatment ctDNA/immune/radiomic dynamics โ†’ tailored local therapy (limited resection, consolidation radiotherapy, or switching systemic treatment) โ†’ pCR-guided adjuvant decisions (de-escalate if pCR; escalate/trial if residual disease).

Future direction: The recurring structural flaw is biomarker-agnostic trial design in unselected populations - effective agents keep failing to reach their optimal niche not from lack of efficacy, but from being tested in the wrong patients. The call to action: integrate dynamic imaging, ctDNA kinetics, and immune profiling into biomarker-enriched, adaptive trial designs - maximizing pCR in high-risk patients while sparing favorable-biology patients from overtreatment.

๐Ÿ”– 0   โค๏ธ 0   ๐Ÿ” 0   ๐Ÿ‘ 6

View on X โ†’

The OncoAlert Network ๐Ÿšจ @oncoalert.bsky.social

Ensartinib in Resected ALK-Positive Nonโ€“Small-Cell Lung Cancer

www.nejm.org/doi/full/10....

In this phase 3 trial, 274 patients with completely resected ALK-positive stage IBโ€“IIIB #NSCLC #LungCancer received ensartinib or placebo after adjuvant chemotherapy. Ensartinib ๐Ÿงช improved DFS

๐Ÿ”– 0   โค๏ธ 0   ๐Ÿ” 0   ๐Ÿ‘ 0

View on X โ†’

Elad Sharon @EladSharonMD

RT @StephenVLiu: Post hoc analysis of PACIFIC (durvalumab after CRT for stage III NSCLC) @TheLancetOncol shows 40% used PPIs at baseline; with durvalumab, PFS 9.4m vs 17.2m with no PPI (HR 1.57) and OS 33m vs 57.9m (HR 1.66). No difference with placebo. Similar PFS findings with antibiotics. https://t.co/HUe303l1dR

๐Ÿ”– 24   โค๏ธ 63   ๐Ÿ” 25   ๐Ÿ‘ 5,484

View on X โ†’

Prepared by Rafael Santana-Davila, M.D. Questions or feedback? Just reply to this email.

Disclaimer: This digest is AI-generated. Content may contain errors -- always verify with original sources.

Know a colleague who would find this useful? Just forward them this email.