OPAL cohort C closed for futility as neoadjuvant niraparib reached 31.6% ORR versus 70.6% with platinum-taxane in HRd advanced ovarian cancer; TEDOVA reported HR 0.53 for OSE2101 plus pembrolizumab maintenance, PYNNACLE reported a 44.4% ORR with rezatapopt in TP53 Y220C-mutated ovarian cancer, and the FDA granted fast track to sapanisertib/serabelisib plus paclitaxel in PI3K/AKT/mTOR-altered endometrial cancer.
π Publications
π¦ Twitter / π¦ Bluesky
Full details below β
Comparing niraparib versus platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with newly diagnosed homologous recombination-deficient stage III/IV ovarian cancer: Findings from cohort C of the OPAL phase 2 trial. β Westin Shannon N et al., Gynecol Oncol
Of 36 patients randomized, 19 received niraparib and 17 platinum-taxane; the pre-IDS unconfirmed ORR was 31.6% with niraparib versus 70.6% with platinum-taxane, a difference of -39.0% (80% CI -56.8% to -17.7%) favoring platinum-taxane, and the trial was closed early for futility. Grade β₯3 adverse-event rates during the neoadjuvant period were 42% with niraparib and 59% with platinum-taxane.
Clinical bottom line: Neoadjuvant niraparib should not replace platinum-taxane chemotherapy before interval debulking in HRd stage III/IV ovarian cancer β response rates were less than half those of chemotherapy and the cohort was stopped for futility.
π Every paper considered this week, including the ones that didnβt make it β
How these are chosen: filtered for clinical relevance, grouped by the new development discussed, then ordered by engagement (bookmarks and reposts).
Described as the first genome-wide in vivo screens for genetic modifications to enhance human T cell therapies for solid tumors and published in Nature, the work identified two suppressive nodes: P2RY8, which appeared to make it harder for T cells to enter tumors, and GNAS, which helped transmit several of the suppressive signals tumors use to shut T cells down. In one melanoma model, all 6 mice treated with GNAS-edited CAR T cells achieved durable tumor clearance, and the approach also improved tumor control across other preclinical models including uterine sarcoma. The central debate is whether engineered T-cell products for gynecologic tumors should be edited at multiple suppressive nodes such as P2RY8 and GNAS rather than carrying a single added receptor.
Discussed by: @EladSharonMD, @EladSharonMD
The ETOP IBCSG position paper summarizes expert recommendations for advancing antibody-drug conjugate research and clinical use across solid tumors β with ADCs increasingly standard in ovarian and cervical cancers β and lists careful selection of trials for phase III, predictive biomarkers, construct and target optimization, and biomarker heterogeneity as stated priorities. Alongside the position statement, a multi-layered screening strategy identifies MSLN, TROP-2, and LIV-1 as potential precision therapy targets in cervical cancer, and mocertatug rezetecan demonstrated robust response rates and a manageable safety profile as monotherapy in the phase 1 BEHOLD-1 study in patients with advanced gynecologic malignancies. The field is weighing which predictive biomarker to require before advancing a B7-H4 or MSLN construct into phase III.
Discussed by: @OncoAlert, @Inside_PM, @OncLive, @onclive.bsky.social
In the phase II PYNNACLE trial, rezatapopt showed antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with TP53 Y220C-mutated advanced ovarian cancer, with a 44.4% ORR and 8.2 months median duration of response. Phase 2 enrollment has since completed, with PMV targeting a 2027 ovarian cancer NDA. Clinicians are now debating whether a single TP53 hotspot such as Y220C is worth routine reporting in recurrent ovarian cancer sequencing panels.
Discussed by: @ASCOPost, @BNTBriefing
The TEDOVA trial reported that OSE2101 plus pembrolizumab beat best supportive care as maintenance in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer, with HR 0.53 (P < .001) β a nearly 50% reduction in risk of progression. Sequencing decisions at relapse are being framed around secondary cytoreduction candidacy, platinum re-treatment strategy, and maintenance selection by response, prior therapy, and biomarkers. The open question is whether a vaccine-plus-checkpoint maintenance strategy competes with PARP inhibitor maintenance in platinum-sensitive relapse, or whether it is best positioned for the PARP-exhausted patient.
Discussed by: @OncLive, @MedwatchKate
Dr Rupam Manna MD @DrRupamOncology
Tisotumab vedotin is a tissue-factor ADC with MMAE for post-chemotherapy recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer. innovaTV 301: OS HR 0.70. Mandatory eye care: examination, steroid + vasoconstrictor drops, cold packs and lubricants. #CervicalCancer #ADC https://t.co/DxzRMyaYLf
π 4 β€οΈ 5 π 2 π 289
ClinicalOncologyNews @ClinOncNews
KEYNOTE-C93 is the first phase 3 trial showing a PD-1 inhibitor alone improved PFS over chemotherapy in front-line dMMR advanced/recurrent endometrial cancerβpotentially changing treatment options: https://t.co/arI33n8etK #EndometrialCancer #oncology https://t.co/cHZPVPeKuD
π 0 β€οΈ 0 π 0 π 77
OncLive.com @OncLive
π― A nearly 50% reduction in risk of progression: OSE2101 plus pembrolizumab beat best supportive care as maintenance in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (HR, 0.53; P < .001). Alexandra Leary, MD, PhD, of @GustaveRoussy, breaks down the TEDOVA data π #ovca #gyncsm https://t.co/ZrLPYM5MTL
π 2 β€οΈ 7 π 0 π 1,598
Dr Swati Shah - MS DNB Surgical Oncology @cancer_clinix
Four years on, RUBY's dMMR/MSI-H curve has not come back down.
PFS at 4 years: 57.9% with dostarlimab + chemo vs 15.7% with chemo alone.
OS: 72.8% vs 40.3%.
MMR status is not a footnote on the histopath report.
#EndometrialCancer #GynOnc
π 0 β€οΈ 0 π 0 π 74
Dr Swati Shah - MS DNB Surgical Oncology @cancer_clinix
Two years of olaparib. Seven years of follow-up.
SOLO-1, BRCA-mutated advanced ovarian cancer: 67.0% alive at 7 years vs 46.5% on placebo. Median PFS 56.0 vs 13.8 months.
The benefit outlasted the treatment.
#OvarianCancer #JCO
π 0 β€οΈ 1 π 0 π 31
Elad Sharon @EladSharonMD
RT @jccarnevale: Incredibly excited to share the first major paper from my lab @carnevale_lab led by postdoc Qi Liu @GladstoneInst @UCSF executing the first ever genome-wide in vivo screens for genetic modifications to enhance human T cell therapies for solid tumors. Now in @Nature: https://t.co/y8eH3Ek9lK
π 76 β€οΈ 322 π 53 π 40,468
Elad Sharon @EladSharonMD
RT @PatrickHwuMD: 𧬠#ScienceSaturday
β What if we could help T cells not only find solid tumors, but also keep fighting once they get there?
β‘οΈ In a new study published in @Nature, researchers used #CRISPR to search across the genome for genes that may be holding human T cells back inside solid tumors.
β‘οΈ Instead of doing the screen only in a lab dish, the team developed a way to study human T cells inside tumor-bearing mice, where they face many of the same barriers that can weaken T cells in real tumors.
β‘οΈ They identified two important βbrakes.β One, called P2RY8, appeared to make it harder for T cells to enter tumors. Another, called GNAS, helped transmit several of the suppressive signals tumors use to shut T cells down.
β‘οΈ When researchers removed GNAS, the engineered T cells were better able to stay active, survive and kill cancer cells despite those suppressive signals. In one melanoma model, all 6 mice treated with GNAS-edited CAR T cells achieved durable tumor clearance.
β‘οΈ The approach also improved tumor control across several other preclinical models, including pancreatic, lung, uterine sarcoma and gastroesophageal cancers, as well as different types of engineered T-cell therapies.
β‘οΈ Even more interesting, removing both P2RY8 and GNAS appeared to tackle two problems at once: helping more T cells get into the tumor and helping them resist being switched off once they were there.
π‘ The big idea: instead of engineering #TCells with just one added weapon, we may be able to make them better equipped to overcome the hostile environment of solid tumors. @UCSF @jccarnevale @MarsonLab @j_eyquem @ShifrutLab @UCSFCancer @GladstoneInst @parkerici @StanfordMed @TelAvivUni @igisci @NaturePortfolio
Read more: https://t.co/zTJpFtFHeB
π 37 β€οΈ 98 π 33 π 9,562
Oncology Brothers @OncBrothers
2025 approvals: Summary of 5 new drugs/indications in #BreastCancer & #GynOnc by Santa aka @US_FDA
1. #DatoDXd
2. #TDXd x2
3. #Imlunestrant
4. #Avutometinib/#Defactinib: Ovarian Ca
#bcsm #OncTwitter #MedTwitter #HappyHolidays #MerryChristmas https://t.co/KPxaS5GWV9
[Quoting @OncBrothers: 2024 approvals: Summary of 8 new drugs/indications in #BreastCancer & #GynOnc by @US_FDA
1. #Ribociclib
2. #Inavolisib
3. #Pembrolizumab x2
4. #Mirvetuximab
5. #Tisotumab
6. #Dostarlimab
7. #Durvalumab
#bcsm #gyncsm #OncTwitter #MedTwitter #HappyHolidays https://t.co/SqUwyupgz1]
π 37 β€οΈ 75 π 30 π 13,274
OncoAlert @OncoAlert
RT @OncoAlert: ADCs π are already changing cancer treatmentβbut are we getting the next generation right?
Antibodyβdrug conjugates in selected solid tumours: a position statement update based on findings from the third workshop held by the ETOP IBCSG Partners Foundation
This position paper summarizes expert recommendations for advancing antibodyβdrug conjugate (ADC) research and clinical use across solid tumors. ADCs are increasingly standard treatments in #LungCancer π« , #BreastCancer, #BladderCancer, #OvarianCancer, and #CervicalCancers. Priorities include carefully selecting trials for phase III, developing predictive biomarkers, optimizing ADC constructs and targets, and addressing biomarker heterogeneity. The experts also highlight artificial intelligence as a potential tool to integrate complex datasets and accelerate discovery of composite biomarkers.
@peters_solange
@BanerjeeSusana
@curijoey
@niklas_kluemper
@g_mountzios
@LuisPaz_Ares
@BarbaraPistill2
@tompowles1
@NReguart
@LizzySmyth1
@CharlesSwanton
@LoiSher
@TobiasSchmelzle
@nataliagandur
@realbowtiedoc
@FernandoOnco
@ElisaAgostinett
@to_be_elizabeth
@MarioBalsaMD
@BRicciutiMD
@HHorinouchi
@UOzkerim
@p_ciracimd
@AmandaNizamMD
@scocmem
@DrVilmaPBarcia
@DraMartinezLago
@DrMirallas
@GIMedOnc
π 5 β€οΈ 21 π 11 π 3,182
The ASCO Post @ASCOPost
πΊ Phase II PYNNACLE trial: Rezatapopt showed antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with TP53 Y220Cβmutated advanced #OvarianCancer.
βοΈ 44.4% ORR
βοΈ 8.2 months median DOR
π£οΈ Presented by Tira J. Tan, BSc, MBBS at #ASCOBT26
π https://t.co/I7PPXcKEYe
π 3 β€οΈ 8 π 3 π 1,950
IJGC @IJGConline
#LeadArticle #RUBYtrial π part 2!
Niraparib in patients with primary advanced or recurrent #endometrialcancer receiving dostarlimab β chemotherapy
π https://t.co/othPkgSrCr
@pedroramirezMD @RParejaGineOnco @HsuMd @JayrajAarthi @AndreFernandes2 @IGCSociety @ESGO_society @ENYGO_official @OncoAlert @IJGCfellows @GynMe4 @ElePanizzolo @esragbilir @ChiaraAinio @alicezampolini @Chiara_4997 @Lawalqdus @kamillaldavid @Dra_AnaConde
π 1 β€οΈ 16 π 6 π 2,549
Supreeth @Supreeth_medonc
CA-125 is frequently used (sometimes misused) during follow-up after CRS and chemotherapy for HGSOC. A single abnormal value should not trigger chemotherapy. It is the trend, alongside symptoms and imaging which matters.
#ClinicalPearlsInOncology
#CPOseries
#Ovariancancer https://t.co/D1VI3WbN3q
π 1 β€οΈ 5 π 0 π 253
OncLive.com @OncLive
βοΈ PFS end points were missed with selinexor maintenance in TP53 wild-type endometrial cancer, according to topline findings from the phase 3 XPORT-EC-042 trial.
Full details π°: https://t.co/bxv3DxwB2p
#oncology
π 1 β€οΈ 1 π 0 π 1,188
Dr.Monica Avila @MAvilaMD
Upfront #immunotherapy ALONE works for upfront #uterinecancer?π Awaiting PFS #s & OS is maturing β²οΈ for Keynote C-93 @Merck. Conundrum for active clinical trials requiring platinum as standard. And π§, can we simply add back chemo later on? @MoffittNews
https://t.co/NeeAWHnwiZ
π 0 β€οΈ 7 π 0 π 379
IJGC @IJGConline
β¨ See you in 1 hour! #IJGCclub!
ποΈ Aug 6 | 7:00 am CDT / 2:00 pm CEST
π PARPi maintenance therapy with niraparib in patients with primary advanced or recurrent #endometrialcancer receiving dostarlimab plus chemotherapy with Matthew A. Powell
π Don't miss this engaging discussion: https://t.co/U879Rhb83X
@pedroramirezMD @HsuMd @JayrajAarthi @AndreFernandes2 @IGCSociety @ESGO_society @ENYGO_official @OncoAlert @IJGCfellows @GynMe4 @ElePanizzolo @esragbilir @ChiaraAinio @alicezampolini @Chiara_4997 @Lawalqdus @kamillaldavid @Dra_AnaConde
π 0 β€οΈ 4 π 3 π 670
Prepared by Rafael Santana-Davila, M.D. Questions or feedback? Just reply to this email.
Disclaimer: This digest is AI-generated. Content may contain errors -- always verify with original sources.
Know a colleague who would find this useful? Just forward them this email.