FDA approvals landed for durvalumab in BCG-naive high-risk NMIBC (POTOMAC), belzutifan plus pembrolizumab in adjuvant RCC (LITESPARK-022), belzutifan plus lenvatinib in 2L ccRCC (LITESPARK-011), lutetium-177 PSMA-617 in mHSPC (PSMAddition) and ctDNA-guided adjuvant atezolizumab (IMvigor011), while urine cfRNA, PSMA-guided radiotherapy and ESMO26 perioperative bladder trials dominated discussion.
๐ Publications
๐ฆ Twitter / ๐ฆ Bluesky
Full details below โ
Phase I/II Study of Bavdegalutamide, a Proteolysis-Targeting Chimera Androgen Receptor Degrader, in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. โ Gao Xin et al., J Clin Oncol
In phase I (N = 95), bavdegalutamide 420 mg once daily was the RP2D in mCRPC previously treated with an ARPI. In phase II, PSA50 and PSA30 rates were 60.0% and 70.0% with AR T878 and/or H875 mutations (n = 20), versus 4.3% and 6.5% with wild-type AR or other AR alterations (n = 46) and 3.1% and 6.3% with AR L702H or AR-V7 (n = 32). Median rPFS in these subgroups was 11.1, 4.2, and 5.1 months, respectively. Among less-pretreated patients (n = 42), PSA50 was 21.4%, PSA30 was 23.8%, and median rPFS was 11.1 months. Among 144 phase II patients, 17.4% had grade 3 TRAEs and none had grade โฅ4 TRAEs, with dose reduction in 11.8% and discontinuation in 11.1%.
Clinical bottom line: Bavdegalutamide is an investigational, biomarker-restricted option. Meaningful PSA and rPFS activity is confined to mCRPC with AR T878/H875 ligand-binding-domain mutations, so AR genotyping would be mandatory before any future use.
Disitamab Vedotin Plus Tislelizumab in Transurethrally Unresectable, ERBB2-Positive, Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial. โ Qie Yunkai et al., JAMA Oncol
This single-arm phase 2 Simon 2-stage trial included 28 participants from 137 screened, with a median follow-up of 29.4 months. Complete response of high-risk disease was achieved in 19 of 26 (73.1%; 95% CI, 54.8%-91.3%), meeting the prespecified 70% goal. Among all 28 participants, 19 responded (67.9%). Among responders, 24-month sustained response was 83.5% (95% CI, 68.0%-100.0%), with no muscle-invasive or metastatic progression. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 25 patients (89.3%), including grade 3 to 4 events in 4 (14.3%), discontinuation in 2 (7.1%), and no grade 5 events.
Clinical bottom line: For the narrow group with transurethrally unresectable ERBB2-positive very-high-risk NMIBC who refuse or cannot have cystectomy, disitamab vedotin plus tislelizumab offers a 73% complete response with durable control. With 28 patients and no randomization, it remains an investigational bridge, not a replacement for cystectomy.
๐ Every paper considered this week, including the ones that didnโt make it โ
How these are chosen: filtered for clinical relevance, grouped by the new development discussed, then ordered by engagement (bookmarks and reposts).
TROFUSE-055 is a randomized phase 3 NMIBC trial testing SAC-TMT with pembrolizumab, which had a 68% response rate in advanced disease, followed by chemoradiation against a chemoRT control with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Unlike EV-309, which gives no chemoRT in the study arm, it raises an unanswered question: is chemoRT needed after an ADC-driven clinical complete response, and many trials will be needed to define the optimal approach. Bladder-preservation advocates warn that very liberal trimodality criteria predispose patients to failure and more salvage cystectomies. Others frame surgery sparing as a recurring pattern across tumor types, with bladder next because patients want their organs.
Discussed by: @seanmmcbride, @Uromigos, @TylerSbrt, @marklewismd
uRARE-seq, a tumor-naive urine cfRNA liquid biopsy published in Nature Medicine, drew praise for its independence from tissue. This matters in Ta, small-focus high-grade, or CIS disease, where tumor-informed utDNA is difficult. Proponents cite sensitive MRD detection and immune signatures predicting BCG versus chemotherapy response. Urologists caution that BCG prediction is underpowered, that false positives occurred in non-cancer controls, and that the assay has no post-treatment validation, where surveillance is hardest. Cleveland Clinic Urology plans to partner with Diehn and ReseroBio on further validation.
Key numbers: Sensitivity 95% at 90% specificity ยท False positives 11% in non-cancer controls
Discussed by: @OncoAlert, @PGrivasMDPhD, @DrewMoghanaki, @weoncologists, @liaojoe1, @SCIDirector
Sources cited: Nature ยท Urine cell-free RNA for bladder cancer detection and treatment response prediction (Nature Medicine, 2026)
ESMO26 will feature VOLGA, which compares EV plus durvalumab, EV plus durvalumab plus tremelimumab, and cystectomy. It will also feature KEYNOTE-866 and ENERGIZE, which test gemcitabine-cisplatin with or without pembrolizumab or nivolumab. The question is whether the chemo-plus-PD-1 trials reproduce NIAGARA's OS hazard ratio of 0.75 or show the platinum antagonism seen in metastatic disease. In VOLGA, EV is limited to three neoadjuvant cycles, versus nine in KEYNOTE-905, where perioperative EV-pembrolizumab gave an OS HR of 0.5-0.6. The debate is whether lower EV exposure is a fair trade, especially since VOLGA has no EV-pembrolizumab comparator despite that regimen's FDA approval.
Discussed by: @tompowles1, @weoncologists, @dr_yakupergun, @OncUpdates
The FDA approved belzutifan plus pembrolizumab based on LITESPARK-022, a phase III trial against 1 year of pembrolizumab in adjuvant RCC. DFS improved, but OS remains immature with median not reached. Grade โฅ3 toxicity rose substantially, and a subset of patients required packed red blood cells or erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Clinicians debate whether the DFS gain justifies adding a year of belzutifan given the toxicity cost.
Key numbers: 2.5-yr DFS 75.8% vs 68.6%, HR 0.72 ยท 2.5-yr OS 95.6% vs 93.8%, HR 0.78 ยท Grade โฅ3 AEs 42.2% vs 17.9% ยท ~12% PRBC/ESA
Discussed by: @OncBrothers, @DrKarineTawagi, @MikeSerzanMD
Reaching the PSA nadir threshold was associated with markedly longer OS and PFS in mHSPC, supporting it as an early prognostic marker. Clinicians discussed PSA monitoring as a guide to treatment decisions. Others noted that no biomarker is perfect, citing a U-shaped association of PSA with prostate cancer-specific mortality in Gleason 8-10 disease in the PET era. The open question is whether failing to reach the nadir should trigger intensification or remain purely prognostic.
Key numbers: OS 92.8 vs 34 mo, HR 0.27 ยท PFS NR vs 12.1 mo, HR 0.19
Discussed by: @g_procopio_, @jjnaylor02, @urotoday
In the post hoc, exploratory non-BRCA-mutated PROpel subgroup, olaparib plus abiraterone improved rPFS over abiraterone alone with no new safety signals. OS did not differ significantly. HRR/BRCA testing still guides who benefits most, and clinicians argue that HRR-positive is not one biology, so the gene and disease state matter. The debate is whether the combination should be offered to non-BRCA mCRPC at all.
Key numbers: rPFS 24.1 vs 19.0 mo, HR 0.76 ยท OS 39.6 vs 38.0 mo, HR 0.91 (NS)
Discussed by: @g_procopio_, @urbano_anido, @ChandrakanthMv
Sources cited: Elsevier
UroToday.com @urotoday
Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 radiographic PFS benefit in the #PSMAddition trial for metastatic hormone-sensitive #ProstateCancer. @DrScottTagawa @WeillCornell joins @CaPsurvivorship @DanaFarber to discuss the PSMAddition FDA approval. The study enrolled patients with PSMA-positive #mHSPC on an ADT plus ARPI doublet and randomized them to addition of up to six cycles of lutetium-177 PSMA-617; any ARPI was permitted. #WatchNow on UroToday > https://t.co/9sts1AdWrF
๐ 1 โค๏ธ 8 ๐ 3 ๐ 983
UroToday.com @urotoday
FDA approval of capivasertib with abiraterone and prednisone in PTEN-deficient androgen pathway modulation-naรฏve or -sensitive #ProstateCancer. @neerajaiims @huntsmancancer hosts an expert panel discussion with @EHeath4100 @MayoClinic, @hoperugo @cityofhope, and @Daniel_J_George @DukeCancer on the CAPItello-281 trial. #WatchNow > https://t.co/vb4Rek0EMj @AstraZeneca
๐ 0 โค๏ธ 13 ๐ 4 ๐ 1,219
Oncology Brothers @OncBrothers
Lu 177/Pluvicto now โ @US_FDA for mCSPC based off PSMAddition!
#OncTwitter #gusm https://t.co/eco3POc8fg
[Quoting @DrKarineTawagi: ๐ฃ FDA approval of Pluvicto triplet vs ADT/ARPI for mCSPC (APMS) #PSMAddition
โ๏ธ rPFS: HR 0.72
โ๏ธ time to mCRPC: HR 0.70
โ๏ธ similar QoL
โOS data immature
โ๏ธ wide eligibility criteria for โ PSMA
โvs chemo or other triplets (PARP/AKT)
Exciting year for GU onc! https://t.co/WgkF00r97z]
๐ 4 โค๏ธ 33 ๐ 9 ๐ 4,678
Oncology Brothers @OncBrothers
Belzutifan + Pembro now @US_FDA โ based off LITESPARK-022: PhIII (vs. Pembro) in adj RCC:
- 2.5yrs DFS: 75.8% vs. 68.6% (HR: 0.72)
- mOS NR
- 2.5yrs OS: 95.6% vs. 93.8% (HR: 0.78)
- AEs: 42.2% vs. 17.9% w/ Gr โฅ 3
#MedTwitter #gusm #KidneyCancer @OncoAlert https://t.co/esYsGSHX3s
๐ 14 โค๏ธ 73 ๐ 38 ๐ 6,275
Oncology Brothers @OncBrothers
Durvalumab now @US_FDA โ for Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder cancer based off #POTOMAC: PhIII, BCG + Durvalumab vs. BCG alone in BCG naive HR-NMIBC:
- DFS waiting maturity (HR: 0.68)
- 3yr mDFS 82% vs 77%
- MedOncs will now see HR-NMIBC
#gusm #OncTwitter https://t.co/OESE7Xy4Hn
๐ 17 โค๏ธ 72 ๐ 35 ๐ 18,994
UroToday.com @urotoday
Approval of Pluvictoยฎ for metastatic hormone-sensitive #ProstateCancer. @sartor_oliver @EJHospital joins @AarmstrongDuke @DukeCancer to review #PSMAddition, covering FDA approval of lutetium-177 PSMA-617 added to a standard ADT plus ARPI doublet in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. #WatchNow on UroToday > https://t.co/u6xdVP7CaV
๐ 3 โค๏ธ 5 ๐ 4 ๐ 827
Oncology Brothers @OncBrothers
Based off LITESPARK-011: Belzutifan + Lenvatinib is now @FDA โ in 2L RCC after IO exposure:
PhIII: Bel + Len vs. Cabo
- mPFS 14.6mos vs. 10.7mos (HR: 0.74)
- mOS 33.7mos vs. 28.6mos (HR: 0.85, p=0.061).
- AEs: 72% vs. 66% w/ Gr โฅ 3
#OncTwitter #gusm @OncUpdates https://t.co/ySsSSFk6m2
๐ 3 โค๏ธ 21 ๐ 11 ๐ 4,234
Karine Tawagi MD @DrKarineTawagi
Today 9/24/26 new approval in 2L clear cell mRCC with some caveats #LITESPARK011
๐ข 4mo PFS gain, higher ORR (53% vs 40%) & DOR (23 v 12mo)
๐ข OS is not yet significant
๐ข how does it perform post 1L IO/IO vs IO/TKI, weight of extra toxicity & optimal sequencing still unclear
[Quoting @OncBrothers: Based off LITESPARK-011: Belzutifan + Lenvatinib is now @FDA โ in 2L RCC after IO exposure:
PhIII: Bel + Len vs. Cabo
- mPFS 14.6mos vs. 10.7mos (HR: 0.74)
- mOS 33.7mos vs. 28.6mos (HR: 0.85, p=0.061).
- AEs: 72% vs. 66% w/ Gr โฅ 3
#OncTwitter #gusm @OncUpdates https://t.co/ySsSSFk6m2]
๐ 3 โค๏ธ 19 ๐ 10 ๐ 2,390
Michael Serzan, MD @MikeSerzanMD
๐ฃ๏ธKidney Oral Abstracts #GU26
๐Dr @motzermd presenting phase 3 #LITESPARK011
๐ฅ ccRCC after progression on anti-PDL1 (n=747)
๐ Belzutifan + Lenvatinib vs Cabozantinib
โ mPFS: 14.6 vs 10.6mo (0.74; 0.61-0.89)
โ ORR: 52.5% vs 39.6%
๐ฐ mOS: NR vs HR (0.90; 0.70-1.15)
โ ๏ธG3 TRAE 84% vs 82.7%
๐Key Data underscoring increased efficacy favoring Bel/Len in refractory ccRCC however pt selection critical given increased AEs.
โCombination vs sequencing VEGF and HIF2 inhibition remains a clinical relevant question.
@DrChoueiri @montypal @motzermd @tompowles1 @TiansterZhang @VincentWenxinXu @BraunMDPhD @katy_beckermann @AlbigesL @bergsa83 @DrKarineTawagi @drenriquegrande @yekeduz_emre @OncoAlert @OncBrothers @urotoday @Uromigos @kidneycan
๐ 2 โค๏ธ 14 ๐ 7 ๐ 621
Dr. Estela Rodriguez @Latinamd
๐ฅAlthough this is so last week- Im still excited about the @US_FDA approval of a drug based on ctDNA MRD patient selection and what this means for clinical trials going forward.
@NateraOncology #Signatera ๐ฉธ๐งฌCompanion Diagnostic for #Atezolizumab in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC) after cystectomy for patients with +CtDNA MRD #IMvigor011 (NCT04660344)
๐ฏctDNA-Guided Adjuvant Atezolizumab in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer | New England Journal of Medicine https://t.co/8PBNQdh8n7
#liquidbiopsy #ctDNA
๐ 2 โค๏ธ 12 ๐ 3 ๐ 1,105
Andrea Apolo, M.D. @apolo_andrea
US FDA Approves #atezolizumab for Adjuvant Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer With #ctDNA-Guided Treatment based on data from #IMvigor011. This is the first approval in #BladderCancer using ctDNA. A step forward in our field. - https://t.co/JKldo5doUN
๐ 2 โค๏ธ 57 ๐ 17 ๐ 5,373
OncoAlert @OncoAlert
RT @LauraBukavinaMD: This is a paper everyone needs to read .. it may ( with time and validation) change our field significantly in both NMIBC and MIBC management couple ๐ญ
- HUGE benefit of cfRNA is 0๏ธโฃdependence on tissue .. anyone trying to do utdna on Ta/ small focus HG/ CIS knows how valuable this is but utDNA tumor informed=cfRNA
- bcg prediction is immature and underpowered but strong signal
- โ๏ธconsider false positives in here 11% in noncancer ctrl. Promising results nonetheless and better than anything we have out there ..
- no validation / testing post tmt the most difficult cohort for surveillance with urine based testing and that is why we @CleClinicUro are excited to partner with @max_diehn and ReseroBio to continue their validation
๐ 38 โค๏ธ 76 ๐ 21 ๐ 7,394
Giuseppe Procopio @g_procopio_
๐ฌ New evidence in #mHSPC
PSA nadir โค0.2 ng/mL was strongly associated with better outcomes:
๐ OS: 92.8 vs 34 mo (HR 0.27)
๐ PFS: NR vs 12.1 mo (HR 0.19) Supporting PSA nadir as an early prognostic marker. #ProstateCancer #GUOncology
Full Article: https://t.co/3KgAAaukPr https://t.co/inJLpAHIYa
๐ 30 โค๏ธ 65 ๐ 36 ๐ 4,482
Petros Grivas @PGrivasMDPhD
RT @DrYukselUrun: Urine cfRNA is emerging as a powerful bladder cancer biomarker: 95% sensitivity at 90% specificity, with potential for MRD detection and BCG-response prediction.
Prospective validation comes next. @NatureMedicine @OncoAlert @OpenMedicineHQ @isliquidbiopsy https://t.co/kTypOlX8dd
๐ 29 โค๏ธ 93 ๐ 26 ๐ 10,386
Journal of Clinical Oncology @JCO_ASCO
RT @drenriquegrande: How do we treat the very elderly with advanced bladder cancer in the era of EV + pembrolizumab, erdafitinib, and avelumab?
With so many new agents available, patient selection and individualized sequencing matter more than ever โ especially in frail or very old patients often excluded from trials.
https://t.co/NIdPU9ZZLp
#BladderCancer @JCO_ASCO
๐ 26 โค๏ธ 64 ๐ 24 ๐ 6,997
1 trial (1 device/procedure) opened this week, testing total consolidative metastasis and primary directed therapy
Phase N/A ยท Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine ยท total consolidative metastasis and primary directed therapy ยท Pennsylvania ยท CT.gov โ
Prepared by Rafael Santana-Davila, M.D. Questions or feedback? Just reply to this email.
Disclaimer: This digest is AI-generated. Content may contain errors -- always verify with original sources.
Know a colleague who would find this useful? Just forward them this email.
☕ Not funded by anyone — no sponsors, no pharma. Buy me a coffee if it's useful.