KEYNOTE-564 five-year data show an overall survival benefit for adjuvant pembrolizumab in ccRCC, the 2026 AUA and EAU NMIBC guidelines reclassify high-grade Ta as high-risk and add checkpoint inhibitors to BCG, RADICAL PC-2 finds cardiology referral for men on ADT lowers cholesterol but not cardiovascular events, and a Korean phase 3 shows 26-fraction salvage prostate bed radiotherapy matches 33 fractions.
๐ฆ Twitter / ๐ฆ Bluesky
Full details below โ
Darolutamide-based triplet therapy versus androgen receptor pathway inhibitor-based doublet therapy for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: a real-world analysis using the TriNetX database. โ Tohi Yoichiro et al., Jpn J Clin Oncol
Among 1,841 patients with mCSPC meeting eligibility criteria from TriNetX data spanning August 2018 to July 2026, after 1:1 propensity score matching (n = 329), triplet therapy was associated with a statistically significant improvement in OS compared with doublet therapy (HR 0.601; 95% CI 0.420โ0.862; log-rank P = .005). Depth of PSA response also favoured triplet therapy: PSA โค0.2 ng/ml was achieved by 26.4% vs 17.0% at 3 months (P = .003) and 50.5% vs 40.1% at any time (P = .008).
Clinical bottom line: This real-world TriNetX comparison continues to favour a darolutamide-docetaxel triplet over ARPI doublets for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer on both overall survival and depth of PSA response; the absence of any head-to-head ARPI doublet trial means the doublet choice itself remains unsettled.
๐ Every paper considered this week, including the ones that didnโt make it โ
How these are chosen: filtered for clinical relevance, grouped by the new development discussed, then ordered by engagement (bookmarks and reposts).
RADICAL PC-2 enrolled 2,487 men with prostate cancer starting ADT across 55 sites and randomized them to usual care versus routine cardiology or internist referral with a statin for all, with a median follow-up of 5.8 years. Cholesterol was lower in the referral group, but the composite of CV death, MI, stroke, and heart failure showed sHR 1.08 (0.79 to 1.49) โ no difference between arms. Routine referral improved cholesterol control and overall risk factor management without translating into a reduction in major cardiovascular events. The practical question the data leave open is whether the lesson is to skip the cardiology referral and simply start the statin on day 1 of ADT.
Discussed by: @avirupguha, @jgong15, @JAMAInternalMed
The five-year follow-up of KEYNOTE-564, now published in Annals of Oncology, reports data from 994 patients randomized after nephrectomy ยฑ metastasectomy to approximately one year of pembrolizumab versus placebo. At a median follow-up of approximately 70 months, 5-year DFS was 60.9% vs 52.2% (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.59โ0.86) and 5-year OS was 87.7% vs 82.3% (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.48โ0.90); a separate long-term summary also cites 6-year DFS of 58.5% vs 48.7% (HR 0.71). Described as the first adjuvant trial in kidney cancer to demonstrate a survival benefit at five or more years, this is now characterised as a sustained overall-survival advantage extending years after a finite treatment course ends โ not simply a DFS-positive result. With that maturity, the debate shifts to whether any high-risk resected ccRCC patient exists for whom adjuvant pembrolizumab would not be discussed.
Discussed by: @EladSharonMD, @ChandrakanthMv, @OncoAlert, @OncoAlert, @ulvyeoflas
The FDA has approved durvalumab plus BCG for BCG-naive high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer on the basis of POTOMAC, a phase III trial comparing BCG plus durvalumab versus BCG alone. DFS HR was 0.68, with 3-year median DFS 82% vs 77%. Published in The Lancet, the trial is expected to draw medical oncologists into a disease space historically managed exclusively by urologists, with the anticipated model being urologist-administered durvalumab alongside medical oncologist collaboration for immune-related adverse events. The open question is which specialty should own immune toxicity management in this setting.
Discussed by: @OncBrothers, @urotoday
LITESPARK-022, the phase III trial of belzutifan plus pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab alone in adjuvant RCC, supported a new FDA approval and reported 2.5-year DFS of 75.8% vs 68.6% (HR 0.72) and 2.5-year OS of 95.6% vs 93.8% (HR 0.78), with grade โฅ3 adverse events occurring in 42.2% vs 17.9% of patients. Clinicians are grouping LITESPARK-022 alongside PROTEUS and TALAPRO-3 as part of a trend toward earlier treatment intensification in GU oncology. The central tension is whether a 7-point DFS gain justifies more than doubling grade โฅ3 toxicity in patients who are already disease-free after nephrectomy.
Discussed by: @OncBrothers, @katy_beckermann
In 316 patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and median pre-RT PSA of 0.36, 65 Gy in 26 fractions versus 66 Gy in 33 fractions to the prostate bed (51% received ADT; 69% had pelvic nodal coverage) produced 4-year bPFS of 80.1% vs 78.1%, DMFS of 91.7% vs 91.0%, and CSS of 100% in both arms at a median follow-up of 52.6 months. Grade 2 or higher GI toxicity was 7.9% vs 0.7%, concentrated in patients without an endorectal balloon, and all events resolved. The URONCOR 06-24 series similarly showed low and comparable early GU/GI toxicity with no meaningful differences in patient-reported outcomes for salvage hypofractionation. The practical question is whether seven fewer trips to the radiotherapy department is sufficient to make moderate hypofractionation the default salvage prescription after prostatectomy.
Discussed by: @JCO_ASCO, @abraocantoMD
A geographic mapping of 436 bladder cancer clinical trials across US counties found that among 3,145 US counties, 77.3% had no bladder cancer trials. Trial access was concentrated in less socially vulnerable counties and was less available in counties with higher mortality โ a direct mismatch between where trials are located and where disease burden is greatest. The data prompt a concrete question: what structural step would place a bladder cancer trial in the high-mortality, high-vulnerability counties currently excluded from access?
Discussed by: @neerajaiims, @JAMANetworkOpen
The EORTC 2238 DE-ESCALATE trial, with its design now published in European Urology, asks whether intermittent maximal androgen blockade can reduce treatment burden while maintaining outcomes in selected men with mHSPC receiving ADT plus ARPI. The parallel OPTIMAS phase 2 randomized trial is separately evaluating treatment de-intensification in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. The debate for clinicians centres on which mHSPC patients on ADT plus ARPI would be appropriate candidates for an intermittent-therapy trial and what evidence would be required before pausing treatment outside a protocol.
Discussed by: @BertrandTOMBAL, @urotoday
KEYNOTE-B15/EV-304, the basis for FDA approval of enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab in cisplatin-ineligible resectable muscle-invasive bladder cancer, reported 2-year EFS of 79.4% vs 66.2% (HR 0.53), 2-year OS of 86.9% vs 81.3% (HR 0.65), and pCR of 55.8% vs 32.5%, with rash and neuropathy as the principal adverse events. An indirect comparison of EV-303 and PURE-01 using Guyot graphical reconstruction of Kaplan-Meier curves in cisplatin-ineligible MIBC has since questioned how much enfortumab vedotin is contributing to pembrolizumab efficacy in this setting. The core debate is how much of the perioperative benefit is attributable to enfortumab vedotin beyond pembrolizumab alone.
Discussed by: @OncBrothers, @urotoday
An exploratory ad hoc analysis of the PEACE-3 trial โ published as "Alkaline Phosphatase and Prostate-specific Antigen Response in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Treated with Enzalutamide Alone or in Combination with Radium-223: Ad Hoc Analysis of the PEACE-3 Consortium Trial" โ found that adding radium-223 to enzalutamide in patients with mCRPC and bone metastases produced faster and more frequent biomarker responses than enzalutamide alone. The combination improved alkaline phosphatase responses and normalization and significantly increased deep PSA responses. The question for clinicians is whether these faster and deeper biomarker responses change the threshold for adding a bone-targeted radiopharmaceutical earlier in the treatment course.
Discussed by: @OncoAlert, @vcclibrary.bsky.social
A multicentre Spanish real-world study of 300 oligometastatic patients across 12 radiotherapy centres treated between 2020 and 2024 found 1- and 2-year progression-free survival of 45.1% and 36.3%, overall survival of 92% and 82.9%, and local control of 90.5% and 85.5%; severe toxicity was rare. Multivariable analyses showed significantly better PFS and OS in prostate cancer patients. In selected oligometastatic RCC patients, active surveillance or metastasis-directed therapy may offer time off systemic therapy with no survival disadvantage. The unresolved question is whether real-world SBRT data sufficient to buy time off systemic therapy justify metastasis-directed treatment outside a trial in oligometastatic GU cancers.
Discussed by: @OncoAlert, @ChiaraRe
OncoAlert @OncoAlert
RT @DrRishabhOnco: KEYNOTE-564: the 5-year update strengthens the case for adjuvant pembrolizumab in high-risk ccRCC.
994 patients after nephrectomy ยฑ metastasectomy were randomized to pembrolizumab for ~1 year vs placebo.
At a median follow-up of ~70 months:
โข 5-year DFS: 60.9% vs 52.2%
HR 0.71 (95% CI 0.59โ0.86)
โข 5-year OS: 87.7% vs 82.3%
HR 0.66 (95% CI 0.48โ0.90)
โข Benefit remained broadly consistent across key subgroups, including risk category, tumor grade and sarcomatoid features.
Safety was unchanged from prior analyses, with no new treatment-related safety signal emerging with longer follow-up.
Why it matters:
The DFS benefit has matured into a sustained OS advantage. This is no longer just recurrence delay.
Clinical verdict: โ Practice-changing and practice-confirming.
For appropriately selected patients with resected ccRCC at increased recurrence risk, adjuvant pembrolizumab remains the benchmark standard.
@ASCO @oncoalert
#KidneyCancer #RCC #KEYNOTE564 #Immunotherapy
๐ 6 โค๏ธ 24 ๐ 14 ๐ 1,914
OncoAlert @OncoAlert
๐จ Five years later, the KEYNOTE-564 question is becoming even harder to ignore: does adjuvant immunotherapy change the long-term trajectory of high-risk ccRCC?
Article๐ฐ
https://t.co/hGhJNVXKxR
Adjuvant pembrolizumab for the treatment of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Five-year results from the phase III KEYNOTE-564 study
With a median 70-month follow-up, KEYNOTE-564 confirms durable benefits from adjuvant pembrolizumab๐งช in clear cell renal cell carcinoma at increased risk of recurrence after surgery. Pembrolizumab ๐ improved disease-free survival (HR 0.71) and overall survival (HR 0.66), with estimated 5-year DFS of 60.9% versus 52.2% and OS of 87.7% ๐ 82.3%. Benefits remained consistent across key subgroups, while safety remained largely unchanged, supporting pembrolizumab as standard care. #KidneyCancer
@tompowles1
@DrChoueiri
@Dr_Tom_Ferguson
@HowardGurney
Pinging our faculty
@apolo_andrea
@neerajaiims
@montypal
@Silke_Gillessen
@AOmlin
@brian_rini
@PGrivasMDPhD
@TiansterZhang
@AlbigesL
@cdanicas
@amerseburger
@sonpavde
@DrDanielHeng
@declangmurphy
@seanmmcbride
@HHammersMD
@shilpaonc
@DrRanaMcKay
@scserendipity1
@DrYukselUrun
@scocmem
@ravikanesvaran
@AmandaNizamMD
@drenriquegrande
@BraunMDPhD
@EfstathiouEleni
@nataliagandur
@crisbergerot
๐ 3 โค๏ธ 20 ๐ 9 ๐ 4,598
Elad Sharon @EladSharonMD
RT @DrChoueiri: The 5-year follow-up from KY-564 now published in @Annals_Oncology --the first ever adjuvant trial in Kidney cancer continues to show a survival benefit now with OS at 5+years and in key subgroups!
https://t.co/qVkVtdVvz7
@HaasNaomi @tompowles1 @OncoAlert @OncBrothers @DanaFarber_GU @DanaFarber @harvardmed @AUC3_Official
๐ 17 โค๏ธ 79 ๐ 28 ๐ 9,100
OncoAlert @OncoAlert
RT @scocmem: ๐ Long-term KEYNOTE-564 results
Adjuvant pembrolizumab in ccRCC shows sustained benefit:
โข 5-y OS: 87.7% vs 82.3% (HR 0.66)
โข 5-y DFS: 60.9% vs 52.2% (HR 0.71)
Results were consistent across key subgroups.
Reassuring long-term data years after treatment @OncoAlert https://t.co/M9zL7MuPOu
๐ 1 โค๏ธ 5 ๐ 4 ๐ 1,218
Oncology Brothers @OncBrothers
RT @DrChoueiri: The 5-year follow-up from KY-564 now published in @Annals_Oncology --the first ever adjuvant trial in Kidney cancer continues to show a survival benefit now with OS at 5+years and in key subgroups!
https://t.co/qVkVtdVvz7
@HaasNaomi @tompowles1 @OncoAlert @OncBrothers @DanaFarber_GU @DanaFarber @harvardmed @AUC3_Official
๐ 17 โค๏ธ 79 ๐ 28 ๐ 9,100
OncoAlert @OncoAlert
RT @DrChoueiri: The 5-year follow-up from KY-564 now published in @Annals_Oncology --the first ever adjuvant trial in Kidney cancer continues to show a survival benefit now with OS at 5+years and in key subgroups!
https://t.co/qVkVtdVvz7
@HaasNaomi @tompowles1 @OncoAlert @OncBrothers @DanaFarber_GU @DanaFarber @harvardmed @AUC3_Official
๐ 17 โค๏ธ 79 ๐ 28 ๐ 9,100
UroToday.com @urotoday
Pluvictoยฎ Approved for PSMA-Positive mHSPC: Bringing Radioligand Therapy Earlier in the Disease Course. @sartor_oliver @EJHospital joins @PhillipKooMD @PCFnews to discuss the @FDA approval of Pluvictoโข (lutetium-177 PSMA-617) in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer based on PSMAddition. #WatchNow on UroToday > https://t.co/cZB9TKP6x5 @DrScottTagawa @Novartis
๐ 0 โค๏ธ 6 ๐ 4 ๐ 1,100
MV Chandrakanth @ChandrakanthMv
KEYNOTE-564 at 5 years: the benefit lasts.
One year of adjuvant pembrolizumab after surgery for high-risk clear-cell RCC translated into durable benefit:
5-y DFS: 60.9% vs 52.2% | HR 0.71
5-y OS: 87.7% vs 82.3% | HR 0.66
The key message: this is no longer simply a DFS-positive adjuvant trial. A finite year of pembrolizumab is associated with a sustained overall-survival advantage years after treatment ends.
Clinical implication: Adjuvant pembrolizumab remains a standard of care for appropriately selected ccRCC patients at increased risk of recurrence after nephrectomy ยฑ metastasectomy.
KEYNOTE-564 | ~70-month median follow-up | Haas et al., Ann Oncol 2026
๐ 4 โค๏ธ 7 ๐ 4 ๐ 664
Oncology Brothers @OncBrothers
EV- Pembro is now @US_FDA โ Cis-ineligible off KEYNOTE-B15/EV-304: EV-Pembro (x4) โ> Surgโ> EV (x5) + Pembro (13) in resectable MIBC
- 2yr EFS: 79.4% vs. 66.2% (HR: 0.53)
- 2yr OS: 86.9% vs. 81.3% (HR: 0.65)
- pCR: 55.8% vs. 32.5%
- AEs: Rash and neuropathy
#gusm #OncTwitter https://t.co/ai3cSEkln2
๐ 6 โค๏ธ 40 ๐ 25 ๐ 4,110
Jun Gong, MD @jgong15
@tompowles1 EV-302 of #1L EV-P vs platinum-chemo in #mUC โก๏ธ updated OS at 3.5 yrs 44% vs 24.6% alive, median 4.3 mos to #CR w/even pts up to 1 yr converting from #PR to #CR, 10% achieve #CR at first scan w/EV-P, (median duration of EV 7.1 mos & 8.5 mos pembro)
#ASCO26 @OncoAlert https://t.co/5COrRmmxqP
๐ 0 โค๏ธ 5 ๐ 7 ๐ 364
OncoAlert @OncoAlert
RT @OncoAlert: This week's OncoAlert ๐จ Newsletter is packed with practice-changing data:
REGISTER TO GET IT ๐ https://t.co/NhtuRoIyO3
NOW OUT!
โ ๏ธ FDA ๐บ๐ธ approves daraxonrasib โ first-in-class RAS inhibitor for metastatic #PancreaticCancer
โ ๏ธFDA approves zanidatamab-hrii + tislelizumab-jsgr for HER2+ gastric/GEJ/esophageal cancer
โ ๏ธMerck & Moderna's INTerpath-001 hits its endpoints โ mRNA neoantigen therapy + pembrolizumab in resected #melanoma
โ ๏ธ5-year KEYNOTE-671 data confirms durable benefit of perioperative pembrolizumab in resectable NSCLC #LungCancer
โ ๏ธDose-escalated radiotherapy (80 Gy) improves 10-year PFS in high-risk #ProstateCancer (GETUG AFU 18)
...and more, curated by practicing oncologists โ for colleagues, by colleagues.
Get it in your inbox every week!
@matteolambe
@aftimosp
@E_de_Azambuja
@DrSGraff
@ErikaHamilton9
@double_whammied
@maryam_lustberg
@raalbany
@hoperugo
@stolaney1
@LoiSher
@JaniceTNBCmets
@montypal
@DrDanielHeng
@apolo_andrea
@DrChoueiri
@PGrivasMDPhD
@TiansterZhang
@neerajaiims
@amerseburger
@sonpavde
@drenriquegrande
@tompowles1
@cdanicas
@nataliagandur
@realbowtiedoc
@Onco_Cifu88
@scocmem
@FernandoOnco
@ElisaAgostinett
@to_be_elizabeth
@Erman_Akkus
@MarioBalsaMD
@DrMirallas
@GIMedOnc
@UOzkerim
@DrRishabhOnco
@PaulJiL
@DaisukeKotani
@DraMartinezLago
@p_ciracimd
@BenWestphalen
@CentralParkWMD
@graokane
@amandaNizamMD
@DrVilmaPBarcia
๐ 2 โค๏ธ 37 ๐ 19 ๐ 11,935
MV Chandrakanth @ChandrakanthMv
IMvigor011 | ctDNA-guided adjuvant therapy in MIBC
A 3-part visual summary:
1๏ธโฃ Who entered โ and how serial ctDNA guided treatment
2๏ธโฃ ctDNA+ / scans negative โ atezolizumab improved DFS + OS
3๏ธโฃ What should we remember in practice?
The key lesson:
One negative ctDNA test is not enough.
Serial ctDNA surveillance can detect emerging MRD โ identify patients who may benefit from treatment โ while potentially sparing treatment in those who remain persistently ctDNAโ.
Powles T, et al. N Engl J Med. 2025;393:2395โ2408.
#MVOnco #BladderCancer #MIBC #ctDNA #MRD #Oncology
๐ 4 โค๏ธ 7 ๐ 3 ๐ 575
MV Chandrakanth @ChandrakanthMv
ESMO 2026: AFTER ONE ARPI, CHANGE THE MECHANISM
ARPI โ ARPI? Think twice. ESMO highlights compelling cross-resistance between abiraterone โ enzalutamide, with only modest efficacy from the second ARPI.
PSMAfore: ยนโทโทLu-PSMA-617 vs ARPI switch โ rPFS HR 0.41, with delayed worsening of QoL and pain.
CARD: after docetaxel + progression โค12 months on an ARPI, cabazitaxel beat ARPI switch โ rPFS HR 0.54 | OS HR 0.64.
Practical message: after progression on an ARPI, think CHANGE THE MECHANISM, rather than reflexively recycling the AR pathway.
๐ Fizazi K, et al. Ann Oncol. 2026;37:590โ604. ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline.
๐ 31 โค๏ธ 52 ๐ 25 ๐ 2,198
Oncology Brothers @OncBrothers
Belzutifan + Pembro now @US_FDA โ based off LITESPARK-022: PhIII (vs. Pembro) in adj RCC:
- 2.5yrs DFS: 75.8% vs. 68.6% (HR: 0.72)
- mOS NR
- 2.5yrs OS: 95.6% vs. 93.8% (HR: 0.78)
- AEs: 42.2% vs. 17.9% w/ Gr โฅ 3
#MedTwitter #gusm #KidneyCancer @OncoAlert https://t.co/esYsGSHX3s
๐ 14 โค๏ธ 74 ๐ 39 ๐ 6,239
Neeraj Agarwal, MD, FASCO @neerajaiims
RT @avirupguha: RADICAL PC-2 gives the strongest randomized evidence yet for organizing #CardioOncology around #ProstateCancer: assess CV risk in everyoneโbut donโt refer every man starting ADT to a specialist. New at #ESC2026. ๐งต @JAMAInternalMed @JACCJournals @escardio #ESCCongress @DarrylLeong @pinthusj
๐ 25 โค๏ธ 60 ๐ 27 ๐ 3,241
Prepared by Rafael Santana-Davila, M.D. Questions or feedback? Just reply to this email.
Disclaimer: This digest is AI-generated. Content may contain errors -- always verify with original sources.
Know a colleague who would find this useful? Just forward them this email.