MATTERHORN final overall survival results (3-year OS 69% vs 62%, HR 0.78) establish perioperative durvalumab plus FLOT as a new standard in resectable gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma, while the adagrasib-cetuximab withdrawal in KRAS G12C colorectal cancer and the daraxonrasib approval dominate the week's other GI conversations.
π Publications
π¦ Twitter / π¦ Bluesky
Full details below β
Perioperative durvalumab plus fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel for resectable gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (MATTERHORN): final results of overall survival and event-free survival by pathological response in a global, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase 3 trial. β Janjigian Yelena Y et al., Lancet
In this phase 3 trial conducted across 147 medical centres in 20 countries, 948 of 1258 enrolled participants were randomly assigned β 474 to durvalumab and 474 to placebo β among adults with stage IIβIVa resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Overall survival significantly improved in the durvalumab versus placebo group (hazard ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.63β0.96; p=0.021). Adverse events with the outcome of death possibly related to any trial treatment occurred in 6 (1%) of 475 participants in the durvalumab group and 2 (<1%) of 469 participants in the placebo group.
Clinical bottom line: Perioperative durvalumab plus FLOT should now be offered as standard treatment for resectable gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, with the caveat that benefit in diffuse-type and PD-L1-negative disease remains contested.
π Every paper considered this week, including the ones that didnβt make it β
How these are chosen: filtered for clinical relevance, grouped by the new development discussed, then ordered by engagement (bookmarks and reposts).
MATTERHORN final results demonstrated a 7% absolute improvement in 3-year OS with perioperative durvalumab plus FLOT (69% vs 62%; HR 0.78), with the OS benefit reaching statistical significance (hazard ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.63β0.96; p=0.021) across 948 patients, among whom pCR was 19% vs 7% and 2-year EFS was 67.4% vs 58.5% (HR 0.71). Notably, 67% of patients had less than a major pathological response β itself a prognostic finding β which some radiation oncologists argue supports testing adaptive radiotherapy to improve local response. The central debate is whether the 7% absolute 3-year OS gain justifies perioperative durvalumab for all comers, or whether diffuse-type and PD-L1-negative patients warrant a different treatment approach.
Discussed by: @Latinamd, @ronanhsieh, @NiuSanford
Sources cited: The Lancet Β· Elsevier
OncoAlert @OncoAlert
RT @OncoAlert: This week's OncoAlert π¨ Newsletter is packed with practice-changing data: REGISTER TO GET IT π https://t.co/NhtuRoIyO3
π¨ THIS WEEK IN ONCOLOGY π¨
Zanidatamab-hrii just posted an improved OS hazard ratio in HER2+ gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma β and that's just the headline. This week's OncoAlert Newsletter also covers:
ποΈ Cemiplimab + fianlimab (dual PD-1/LAG-3 blockade) nearly doubling pCR rates in high-risk breast cancer (I-SPY2)
π« 5-year AEGEAN data on perioperative durvalumab in resectable NSCLC
𧬠DEEPER trial's final word on FOLFOXIRI + cetuximab vs bevacizumab in left-sided mCRC
β’οΈ Radium-223 + enzalutamide accelerating biochemical responses in bone-metastatic mCRPC (PEACE-3)
π¬ TALENTOP: does liver resection after atezolizumab/bevacizumab extend disease control in advanced HCC?
Curated weekly, for colleagues, by colleagues β the biggest trial readouts and practice-changing data across GI, lung, breast, and GU oncology, distilled into a 2-minute read.
@matteolambe
@aftimosp
@E_de_Azambuja
@DrSGraff
@ErikaHamilton9
@double_whammied
@maryam_lustberg
@raalbany
@hoperugo
@stolaney1
@LoiSher
@JaniceTNBCmets
@montypal
@DrDanielHeng
@apolo_andrea
@DrChoueiri
@PGrivasMDPhD
@TiansterZhang
@neerajaiims
@amerseburger
@sonpavde
@drenriquegrande
@tompowles1
@cdanicas
@nataliagandur
@realbowtiedoc
@Onco_Cifu88
@scocmem
@FernandoOnco
@ElisaAgostinett
@to_be_elizabeth
@Erman_Akkus
@MarioBalsaMD
@DrMirallas
@GIMedOnc
@UOzkerim
@DrRishabhOnco
@PaulJiL
@DaisukeKotani
@DraMartinezLago
@p_ciracimd
@BenWestphalen
@CentralParkWMD
@graokane
@amandaNizamMD
@DrVilmaPBarcia
π 4 β€οΈ 30 π 16 π 8,255
Oncology Brothers @OncBrothers
RT @Timothee_MD: Adagrasib was just withdrawn by the @FDA in metastatic colorectal cancer based on the negative results in KRYSTAL-10
"A waterfall plot can look impressive, and high response rates can create enthusiasm, but they should not be confused with proven clinical benefit."
From Sahar van Waalwijk, new guest post in
https://t.co/P3NUOebqBF !
π 31 β€οΈ 92 π 36 π 61,681
Ronan Hsieh, MD, MS @ronanhsieh
RT @GIMedOnc: And just like that, adagrasib + cetuximab is no longer FDA approved for KRAS G12C colorectal cancer.
The accelerated approval was officially withdrawn September 1 after KRYSTAL-10 failed to confirm benefit.
We talked about KRYSTAL-10 when it was presented earlier this year.
The phase III randomized 461 patients in 2L to adagrasib + cetuximab vs chemotherapy Β± VEGF inhibition.
It missed both primary endpoints:
βͺοΈPFS: 7.5 vs 8.1 months, HR 0.89β¨βͺοΈOS: 21.6 vs 21.7 months, HR 0.83
Hard to argue with a negative phase III trial.
But I still like the idea of a chemo free option.
Response rate was 47% vs 16%.
That could matter for some patients (like those who you need just a little more shrinkage to enable crative intent therapy).
KRYSTAL-10 asked whether adagrasib + cetuximab was better than chemotherapy in 2L.
It wasnβt.
That doesnβt mean the concept of KRAS G12C + EGFR blockade was wrong. And it doesnβt mean there arenβt patients for which this isnt valuable.
Anyone celebrating this should look themselves in the mirror; this is a tool that has just been removed from our arsenal. However, the FDA did exactly what the system is designed to do; pull back if the Ph III doesnt pan out after accelerated approval.
@OncoAlert @TheGutOncLab @Onco_Nexus
π 44 β€οΈ 113 π 41 π 50,459
Lurie Cancer Center @LurieCancer
A milestone in #PancreaticCancer research: the #FDA has approved #daraxonrasib (#Rasonque), a first-in-class targeted therapy for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. @NorthwesternMed's Devalingam Mahalingam, MD, PhD, explains how targeting #KRAS signaling may help prevent tumor growth and reshape the future of treatment.
Learn more: https://t.co/89zUiqMduY
π 0 β€οΈ 0 π 1 π 149
Cancer Survivors Club π @thecancersurvivorsclub.com
A major advance for pancreatic cancer. FDA-approved daraxonrasib increased median survival to 13.2 months vs 6.7 months with chemotherapy in a Phase 3 trial.
www.healthcare-brew.com/stories/onco...
#PancreaticCancer #TCSC
π 0 β€οΈ 0 π 1 π 0
Dee Sparacio @womenofteal
RT @PanCAN: RASONQUEβ’ (daraxonrasib) has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of adults with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma who have received at least one prior systemic therapy or are not candidates for multiagent systemic therapy. π
In the latest episode of PancChat, host @AlisynCamerota is joined by Dr. Brian Wolpin of @DanaFarber Cancer Institute to break down what the approval means for patients, how RASONQUE works, who may be eligible, side effects and whatβs next for RAS-targeted therapies.
Visit π https://t.co/HGtNQOd4dT to listen.
The PancChat podcast is a collaboration between @LetsWinPC and PanCAN, and this episode is sponsored by @RevMedicines.
π 7 β€οΈ 24 π 18 π 4,775
Ronan Hsieh, MD, MS @ronanhsieh
RT @DraMartinezLago: 𧬠MATTERHORN | Phase III | Resectable GC/GEJ
π₯ 948 pts
π Periop durvalumab + FLOT vs FLOT
π― pCR 19% vs 7%
β³ 2-y EFS 67.4% vs 58.5% | HR .71
π 3-y OS 69% vs 62% | OS HR .78, P=.021
π‘ New perioperative SoC.
π https://t.co/RLH9v0Pyux
@OncoAlert https://t.co/XA4dcfggBQ
π 13 β€οΈ 54 π 23 π 3,685
OncoAlert @OncoAlert
RT @DraMartinezLago: 𧬠MATTERHORN | Phase III | Resectable GC/GEJ
π₯ 948 pts
π Periop durvalumab + FLOT vs FLOT
π― pCR 19% vs 7%
β³ 2-y EFS 67.4% vs 58.5% | HR .71
π 3-y OS 69% vs 62% | OS HR .78, P=.021
π‘ New perioperative SoC.
π https://t.co/RLH9v0Pyux
@OncoAlert https://t.co/XA4dcfggBQ
π 13 β€οΈ 54 π 23 π 3,685
Dr. Estela Rodriguez @Latinamd
RT @dr_yakupergun: MATTERHORN final results: a 7% absolute improvement in 3-year OS with perioperative durvalumab + FLOT (69% vs 62%; HR 0.78).
Periop durvalumab + FLOT: SoC β οΈ
However, I still have concerns about the magnitude of benefit in diffuse-type and PD-L1βnegative disease.
https://t.co/yo6gCcFjm2
π 40 β€οΈ 132 π 43 π 9,991
Journal of Clinical Oncology @JCO_ASCO
βΌοΈ #ASCO26 simultaneous publication by Bekaii-Saab et al:
Pemigatinib for Unresectable or Metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma With Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor-2 Rearrangement: Results From the Phase 3 FIGHT-302 Trial
Read the full article: https://t.co/4Tm3YZ9hOx
#gicsm https://t.co/Ml26XElTuZ
π 1 β€οΈ 7 π 5 π 997
Diogo Silva @SilvajDiogo
π¨Glow trial: Zolbetuximab+CAPOX
𧬠1st line mG/GEJ Cancer - Phase 3
π―CLDN18.2-pos/HER-2 neg
β οΈPFS: 8.21βmonths vs 6.80βmonths β οΈ OS: 14.39βmonths vs 12.16βmonths
β£οΈ Gβ₯3 TRAEs similar(72.8% vs69.9%)
#gastricancer
@JIPOEditors @OncoAlert @Nature https://t.co/pTixSEzwXY
π 0 β€οΈ 3 π 0 π 133
Allison Rosen, MS @ARosen380
This shows that the approval process is not always slow. May this be an example for other drugs for every cancer! #ayacsm #crcsm
[Quoting @OncoAlert: The FDA πΊπΈ approved daraxonrasib, a first-in-class RAS inhibitor, for adults with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma who have received prior systemic therapy or cannot receive multiagent treatment. Taken daily, the drug targets RAS proteins that drive tumor growth.
β οΈ The approval, issued ahead of schedule, provides a new treatment option for a cancer with limited therapies and poor outcomes. #PancreaticCancer
https://t.co/Iv2XGawyFI
@CathyEngMD
@BenWestphalen
@graokane
@NiuSanford
@AndresC27622123
@GillSharlene
@pashtoonkasi
@DrVilmaPBarcia
@Erman_Akkus
@GIMedOnc
@UOzkerim
@MarioBalsaMD
@p_ciracimd
@DraMartinezLago
@DaisukeKotani
@Aiims1742
@ARosen380
@realbowtiedoc
@KoheiShitara
@MarioBalsaMD
@realbowtiedoc
@p_ciracimd
@c_eng1
@sharlenegill
@alicat380
@erman_akkus__
@ninan1230
@shitarakohei]
π 0 β€οΈ 13 π 2 π 1,215
Grainne O'Kane @graokane
πHistoric and incredible moment for patients with pancreatic cancer #PDAC
βοΈDaraxonrasib FDA approved
πwe need global access & a quick #EMA approval
@pancanireland @P_C_E_ @cancertrials_ie @myESMO
[Quoting @OncoAlert: The FDA πΊπΈ approved daraxonrasib, a first-in-class RAS inhibitor, for adults with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma who have received prior systemic therapy or cannot receive multiagent treatment. Taken daily, the drug targets RAS proteins that drive tumor growth.
β οΈ The approval, issued ahead of schedule, provides a new treatment option for a cancer with limited therapies and poor outcomes. #PancreaticCancer
https://t.co/Iv2XGawyFI
@CathyEngMD
@BenWestphalen
@graokane
@NiuSanford
@AndresC27622123
@GillSharlene
@pashtoonkasi
@DrVilmaPBarcia
@Erman_Akkus
@GIMedOnc
@UOzkerim
@MarioBalsaMD
@p_ciracimd
@DraMartinezLago
@DaisukeKotani
@Aiims1742
@ARosen380
@realbowtiedoc
@KoheiShitara
@MarioBalsaMD
@realbowtiedoc
@p_ciracimd
@c_eng1
@sharlenegill
@alicat380
@erman_akkus__
@ninan1230
@shitarakohei]
π 2 β€οΈ 27 π 6 π 1,320
Targeted Oncology @TargetedOnc
π’ BREAKING: The #FDA has approved daraxonrasib for patients with previously treated metastatic #PDAC, supported by data from the phase 3 RASolute 302 trial.
Read more about the approval: https://t.co/CuOTszDlDO
#PancreaticCancer #Oncology #CancerTreatment
π 0 β€οΈ 3 π 1 π 622
Dana-Farber News @danafarbernews.bsky.social
Dr. Brian Wolpin tells the Harvard Gazette that the FDA approval of daraxonrasib, supported by @danafarber.bsky.social research, has the potential to meaningfully transform #PancreaticCancer care.
Read more: bit.ly/4hhUbvE
π 0 β€οΈ 1 π 0 π 0
7 trials (2 phase III, 2 phase II, 3 phase I) opened this week, testing ASP2138, zoldonrasib plus daraxonrasib, ASP388B, BNT317, SKL35501, ADCE-T02 and ZEN-3694 β see them all on the website β
Agent descriptions from the NCI Thesaurus.
Prepared by Rafael Santana-Davila, M.D. Questions or feedback? Just reply to this email.
Disclaimer: This digest is AI-generated. Content may contain errors -- always verify with original sources.
Know a colleague who would find this useful? Just forward them this email.
☕ Not funded by anyone — no sponsors, no pharma. Buy me a coffee if it's useful.