Also considered

๐ŸŽ€ GYN Oncology โ€” 2026-W40

10 papers judged, 0 emailed  ยท  Read the digest →

What this page is. Every paper the week's monitor reviewed โ€” including the ones that did not go into the digest. Material marked “Not selected” was reviewed and deliberately left out. It has not been fact-checked to digest standard and is not endorsed. For the curated read, see the digest itself.

Papers judged this week

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Combinations in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Not selected
Choi Boram et al., Cancers (Basel)

Systematic review and meta-analysis of phase 3 RCTs of checkpoint inhibitor combinations in advanced ovarian cancer, published in Cancers (Basel). Finds that adding bevacizumab (and possibly PARP inhibitors) to ICIs improves progression-free survival while chemo-ICI combinations do not, informing which combination partners may be worth pursuing.

Guidelines for the treatment of ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, and primary peritoneal cancer: 2025 edition by the Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology.
Not selected
Shoji Tadahiro et al., J Gynecol Oncol

Updated 2025 clinical practice guideline from the Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology for ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer, published in the Journal of Gynecologic Oncology. Revises recommendations on HRD/genomic testing, PARP inhibitor and bevacizumab maintenance, and surgical strategy, directly shaping systemic therapy decisions.

Randomized Prospective Comparison Between Neoadjuvant Mitomycin C Plus Cisplatin and Paclitaxel Plus Carboplatin in Patients With BRCA1-Associated Ovarian Cancer.
Not selected
Gorodnova Tatiana V et al., Int J Cancer

Randomized phase 2 trial comparing neoadjuvant mitomycin C/cisplatin versus paclitaxel/carboplatin specifically in BRCA1-associated advanced ovarian cancer, published in Int J Cancer. Explores an alternative neoadjuvant regimen in a rare, biomarker-defined population, informing surgical cytoreduction outcomes though survival differences were not significant.

Prognostic and therapeutic implications of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in ovarian cancer.
Not selected
Pawul Weronika et al., Front Oncol

Narrative review in Frontiers in Oncology summarizing prognostic and therapeutic implications of BRCA1/2 mutations in ovarian cancer. Consolidates evidence on platinum sensitivity and PARP inhibitor efficacy relevant to treatment selection.

Breast-Ovarian Hereditary Cancer Syndrome: Beyond BRCA1 and BRCA2.
Not selected
Imyanitov Evgeny et al., Curr Oncol

Narrative review in Curr Oncol on hereditary breast-ovarian cancer genes beyond BRCA1/2. Highlights how germline PALB2, RAD51C, and RAD51D variants confer sensitivity to PARP inhibitors, informing genetic testing panels and targeted therapy selection.

A phase II study in newly diagnosed stage III/IV epithelial ovarian cancer evaluating carboplatin/taxol/pembrolizumab in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by pembrolizumab maintenance with or without olaparib.
Not selected
Edwards Carson C et al., Gynecol Oncol

Protocol description of a randomized phase 2 trial combining neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy, HIPEC, and maintenance pembrolizumab with or without olaparib in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, published in Gynecologic Oncology. No efficacy results reported yet; informs an emerging multimodal treatment strategy under investigation.

Association of community-level social vulnerability with county-level clinical trial access among ovarian cancer patients.
Not selected
O'Connor Reed M et al., Gynecol Oncol

Retrospective registry analysis linking community social vulnerability to clinical trial availability in ovarian cancer, published in Gynecologic Oncology. Highlights disparities in trial access that could inform efforts to improve equitable enrollment, though it does not directly change treatment decisions.

Concordance between gastric HER2 scores for endometrial sampling versus hysterectomy specimens in endometrial cancer.
Not selected
Salinaro Julia R et al., Gynecol Oncol

Retrospective institutional cohort study in Gynecologic Oncology comparing HER2 scoring concordance between biopsy and hysterectomy specimens in high-grade endometrial cancer. Finds substantial discordance that could alter eligibility for HER2-directed therapy, suggesting caution in relying on a single specimen type for biomarker-driven treatment decisions.

Effectiveness of first-line niraparib maintenance in Korean patients with advanced ovarian cancer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.
Not selected
Kang Ok-Ju et al., J Gynecol Oncol

Multicenter retrospective cohort study in Korean patients with advanced ovarian cancer receiving first-line niraparib maintenance, published in J Gynecol Oncol. Supports real-world PFS/OS benefit of niraparib maintenance across BRCA subgroups, reinforcing current practice.

Survival Impact of Bevacizumab According to Chemotherapy Response Score in Advanced High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
Not selected
Ege Hasan Volkan et al., Cancers (Basel)

Retrospective cohort study in advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, published in Cancers. Suggests chemotherapy response score may help identify which patients derive survival benefit from sustained bevacizumab, offering a potential biomarker for treatment selection.

← All weeks